TY - JOUR
T1 - Physician's Communication in Code Status Discussions for Terminally Ill Cancer Patients in Inpatient Hospice/Palliative Care Units in Japan
T2 - A Nationwide Post-Bereavement Survey
AU - Kizawa, Yoshiyuki
AU - Yamaguchi, Takashi
AU - Sakashita, Akihiro
AU - Aoyama, Maho
AU - Morita, Tatsuya
AU - Tsuneto, Satoru
AU - Shima, Yasuo
AU - Miyashita, Mitsunori
N1 - Funding Information:
None of the authors have any competing interests to declare. The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: funded by the Japan Hospice Palliative Care Foundation and co-supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI ( JP19H03872 , JP20H03925 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - Context: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation is one of the most important end-of-life care decisions. However, the experience of bereaved families during code status discussions is not well documented. Objective: The aims of this study were to describe the degree of emotional distress of bereaved families when discussing code status, identify their perceived areas for improvement and determine associated factors. Methods: This study is part of a nationwide post-bereavement survey, the Japan Hospice and Palliative care Evaluation 3 (J-HOPE3) study. Questionnaires were sent to the relatives of cancer patients who had died in palliative care units in Japan in 2014. Results: From an analysis of 338 questionnaires, 37% of families reported high emotional distress during code status discussions and 32% reported a need for improvement. Multiple logistic regression analyses revealed the following were associated with high-level distress: the family had hoped for the miraculous and spontaneous recovery of the patient (odds ratio [OR] 2.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31—4.43, P = 0.0049), the family felt they could not voice their opinion about Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (OR 2.07, CI 1.12—3.81, P = 0.02), or the physician failed to adapt the explanation to the family's preparation level (OR 0.36, CI 0.18—0.68, P = 0.0015). Factors identified for improvement were: holding discussions in a relaxing atmosphere conducive to questioning (OR 0.36, CI 0.16-0.80, P = 0.012), and ensuring the physician adapted the explanation to the family's preparation level (OR 0.47, CI 0.23-0.96, P = 0.037). Conclusion: We recommend the development of educational programs for code status discussions to improve the experience of bereaved family members.
AB - Context: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation is one of the most important end-of-life care decisions. However, the experience of bereaved families during code status discussions is not well documented. Objective: The aims of this study were to describe the degree of emotional distress of bereaved families when discussing code status, identify their perceived areas for improvement and determine associated factors. Methods: This study is part of a nationwide post-bereavement survey, the Japan Hospice and Palliative care Evaluation 3 (J-HOPE3) study. Questionnaires were sent to the relatives of cancer patients who had died in palliative care units in Japan in 2014. Results: From an analysis of 338 questionnaires, 37% of families reported high emotional distress during code status discussions and 32% reported a need for improvement. Multiple logistic regression analyses revealed the following were associated with high-level distress: the family had hoped for the miraculous and spontaneous recovery of the patient (odds ratio [OR] 2.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31—4.43, P = 0.0049), the family felt they could not voice their opinion about Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (OR 2.07, CI 1.12—3.81, P = 0.02), or the physician failed to adapt the explanation to the family's preparation level (OR 0.36, CI 0.18—0.68, P = 0.0015). Factors identified for improvement were: holding discussions in a relaxing atmosphere conducive to questioning (OR 0.36, CI 0.16-0.80, P = 0.012), and ensuring the physician adapted the explanation to the family's preparation level (OR 0.47, CI 0.23-0.96, P = 0.037). Conclusion: We recommend the development of educational programs for code status discussions to improve the experience of bereaved family members.
KW - Palliative care
KW - cardiopulmonary resuscitation
KW - code status discussion
KW - inpatient palliative care unit
KW - neoplasms
KW - post-bereavement survey
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106342363&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85106342363&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.03.011
DO - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.03.011
M3 - Article
C2 - 33757891
AN - SCOPUS:85106342363
VL - 62
SP - e120-e129
JO - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
JF - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
SN - 0885-3924
IS - 3
ER -