TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving Quantum Annealing Performance on Embedded Problems
AU - Zielewski, Michael R.
AU - Agung, Mulya
AU - Egawa, Ryusuke
AU - Takizawa, Hiroyuki
N1 - Funding Information:
This work is partially supported by MEXT Next Generation High-Performance Computing Infrastructures and Applications R&D Program “R&D of A Quantum-Annealing-Assisted Next Generation HPC Infrastructure and its Applications”, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research(B) #16H02822 and #17H01706.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020. The Authors 2020. This paper is published with open access at SuperFri.org. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Recently, many researchers have been investigating quantum annealing as a solver for realworld combinatorial optimization problems. However, due to the format of problems that quantum annealing solves and the structure of the physical annealer, these problems often require additional setup prior to solving. We study how these setup steps affect performance and provide insight into the interplay among them using the job-shop scheduling problem for our evaluation. We show that the empirical probability of success is highly sensitive to problem setup, and that excess variables and large embeddings reduce performance.We then show that certain problem instances are unable to be solved without the use of additional post-processing methods. Finally, we investigate the effect of pausing during the anneal. Our results show that pausing within a certain time window can improve the probability of success, which is consistent with other work. However, we also show that the performance improvement due to pausing can be masked depending on properties of the embedding, and thus, special care must be taken for embedded problems.
AB - Recently, many researchers have been investigating quantum annealing as a solver for realworld combinatorial optimization problems. However, due to the format of problems that quantum annealing solves and the structure of the physical annealer, these problems often require additional setup prior to solving. We study how these setup steps affect performance and provide insight into the interplay among them using the job-shop scheduling problem for our evaluation. We show that the empirical probability of success is highly sensitive to problem setup, and that excess variables and large embeddings reduce performance.We then show that certain problem instances are unable to be solved without the use of additional post-processing methods. Finally, we investigate the effect of pausing during the anneal. Our results show that pausing within a certain time window can improve the probability of success, which is consistent with other work. However, we also show that the performance improvement due to pausing can be masked depending on properties of the embedding, and thus, special care must be taken for embedded problems.
KW - combinatorial optimization
KW - job-shop scheduling
KW - quantum annealing
KW - quantum computer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101582639&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85101582639&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.14529/js?200403
DO - 10.14529/js?200403
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85101582639
VL - 7
SP - 32
EP - 48
JO - Supercomputing Frontiers and Innovations
JF - Supercomputing Frontiers and Innovations
SN - 2409-6008
IS - 4
ER -