Immunohistochemical comparison between anaplastic seminoma and typical seminoma

Takashi Suzuki, Hironobu Sasano, Hiroshi Aoki, Hiroshi Nagura, Nobuaki Sasano, Toshiaki Sano, Masahiro Saito, Tsutomu Watanuki, Hiroyuki Kato, Shigeo Aizawa

研究成果: Article査読

6 被引用数 (Scopus)

抄録

In order to study the possible biological differences between anaplastic and typical seminoma, the following factors were studied in 11 cases of anaplastic seminoma and 15 cases of typical seminoma: mitotic activity, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) expression, immunohistochemical analyses for cytokeratin, vimentin, placental alkaline phosphatase (PLAP), β‐human chorionic gonadotropin (β‐hCG), a‐fetoprotein (AFP) and c‐myc oncoprotein. Anaplastic seminoma was classified according to Mostofi's criteria, which is primarily based on the mitotic activity of the tumor. Mitotic activity was evaluated by both mitotic count and rate. Statistically significant correlations were observed between mitotic count and mitotic rate (R= 0.891), and between the mitotic count and PCNA labeling index (R= 0.792), in both typical and anaplastic seminomas. Immunostaining patterns for cytokeratin, vimentin, PLAP, β‐hCG, AFP and c‐myc oncoprotein were not significantly different between typical and anaplastic seminoma. The present data indicated that no apparent clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical parameters discerning anaplastic seminoma from typical seminoma were present, when identifying anaplastic seminoma on the basis of high mitotic count. Anaplastic seminoma may therefore simply represent seminoma with high proliferative activity.

本文言語English
ページ(範囲)751-757
ページ数7
ジャーナルPathology international
43
12
DOI
出版ステータスPublished - 1993 12

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

フィンガープリント 「Immunohistochemical comparison between anaplastic seminoma and typical seminoma」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。

引用スタイル