Erratum to “Comparison between the improvements made to the fatigue strength of stainless steel by cavitation peening, water jet peening, shot peening and laser peening” (Journal of Materials Processing Tech. (2019) 269 (65–78), (S0924013619300366), (10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.01.030))

研究成果: Comment/debate査読

1 被引用数 (Scopus)

抄録

The publisher regrets that incorrect versions of Figs. 4, 6, 16, 18, and 20 were used in this article. The correct figures are reproduced here. [figure-presented] Fig. 4. Dimensions of bending fatigue specimen (Thickness: 2 mm). [figure-presented] Fig. 6. Optimum standoff distances for water jet peening and cavitation peening. [figure-presented] Fig. 16. Surface Vickers hardness as a function of processing time or pulse density. [figure-presented] Fig. 18. Surface residual stress as a function of processing time or pulse density. [figure-presented] Fig. 20. The normalized fatigue life at σa = 400 MPa as a function of the normalized surface Vickers hardness and surface roughness. The publisher would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

本文言語English
ページ(範囲)381-382
ページ数2
ジャーナルJournal of Materials Processing Technology
270
DOI
出版ステータスPublished - 2019 8

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • セラミックおよび複合材料
  • コンピュータ サイエンスの応用
  • 金属および合金
  • 産業および生産工学

フィンガープリント

「Erratum to “Comparison between the improvements made to the fatigue strength of stainless steel by cavitation peening, water jet peening, shot peening and laser peening” (Journal of Materials Processing Tech. (2019) 269 (65–78), (S0924013619300366), (10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.01.030))」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。

引用スタイル