TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of propofol on sevoflurane agitation in children
AU - Chiba, Satoko
AU - Shima, Takeshi
AU - Murakami, Noritaka
AU - Kato, Masato
PY - 2003/6/1
Y1 - 2003/6/1
N2 - Background: Sevoflurane may be associated with a high incidence of agitation during recovery from anesthesia in children. We tested the hypothesis that bolus administration of propofol after sevoflurane anesthesia would reduce the incidence of recovery agitation compared with sevoflurane anesthesia alone. Methods: We conducted a randomized, double-blinded study in 90 children, 1-7 yr of age, undergoing short general anesthesia. They were divided into three groups; 2 mg · kg-1 propofol (group P 2), 1 mg · kg-1 propofol (group P 1) and intralipid 0.2 ml · kg-1 as control (group C). After sevoflurane induction and maintenance and 5 minutes before the end of operation, propofol or intralipid was administered. We compared the speed and quality of each recovery. We made a new scoring system for the assessment of agitation. Each child received a point from -4 to 10 with this system. Results: Recovery score was similar among the three groups (group P 2 had point 4, group P 1, point 5, and group C point 4). Recovery time in group P 2 was significantly longer than that in group C (about 6 minutes). Conclusions: Bolus administration of propofol after sevoflurane anesthesia prolonged recovery time, but did not inhibit sevoflurane agitation compared with sevoflurane anesthesia alone.
AB - Background: Sevoflurane may be associated with a high incidence of agitation during recovery from anesthesia in children. We tested the hypothesis that bolus administration of propofol after sevoflurane anesthesia would reduce the incidence of recovery agitation compared with sevoflurane anesthesia alone. Methods: We conducted a randomized, double-blinded study in 90 children, 1-7 yr of age, undergoing short general anesthesia. They were divided into three groups; 2 mg · kg-1 propofol (group P 2), 1 mg · kg-1 propofol (group P 1) and intralipid 0.2 ml · kg-1 as control (group C). After sevoflurane induction and maintenance and 5 minutes before the end of operation, propofol or intralipid was administered. We compared the speed and quality of each recovery. We made a new scoring system for the assessment of agitation. Each child received a point from -4 to 10 with this system. Results: Recovery score was similar among the three groups (group P 2 had point 4, group P 1, point 5, and group C point 4). Recovery time in group P 2 was significantly longer than that in group C (about 6 minutes). Conclusions: Bolus administration of propofol after sevoflurane anesthesia prolonged recovery time, but did not inhibit sevoflurane agitation compared with sevoflurane anesthesia alone.
KW - Children
KW - Propofol
KW - Sevoflurane agitation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037971058&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037971058&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 12854475
AN - SCOPUS:0037971058
VL - 52
SP - 611
EP - 615
JO - Japanese Journal of Anesthesiology
JF - Japanese Journal of Anesthesiology
SN - 0021-4892
IS - 6
ER -