TY - JOUR
T1 - Densified biocoal from woodchips
T2 - Is it better to do torrefaction before or after densification?
AU - Ghiasi, Bahman
AU - Kumar, Linoj
AU - Furubayashi, Takaaki
AU - Lim, C. Jim
AU - Bi, Xiaotao
AU - Kim, Chang Soo
AU - Sokhansanj, Shahab
N1 - Funding Information:
Authors gratefully acknowledge the research support from Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and BioFuelNet, Canada.
PY - 2014/12/1
Y1 - 2014/12/1
N2 - Torrefied biomass represents a high quality renewable energy commodity that can be used to substitute fossil fuels such as coal. However, densification processes such as pelletisation is necessary to improve the tradability of "low-dense" torrefied biomass. In this work, two process pathways were assessed for energy and mass balance in making torrefied pellets from softwood chips and qualities of the resulting torrefied pellets were compared. Pathway I involve drying the wood chips, torrefaction, grinding followed by densification. In pathway II, wood chips were dried, ground, densified and finally torrefied. The results showed that it was difficult to bind the torrefied biomass particles and a binding agent was necessary to enable their effective pelletisation with reasonable energy consumption. In contrary, pelletization of raw materials was possible without using binding agents and when the "raw wood pellets" were torrefied, the pellets surprisingly stayed intact and had several promising properties such as higher energy/carbon value, reduced moisture content and higher stability in water. In addition, the pathway II was more efficient in terms of overall energy and material balance.
AB - Torrefied biomass represents a high quality renewable energy commodity that can be used to substitute fossil fuels such as coal. However, densification processes such as pelletisation is necessary to improve the tradability of "low-dense" torrefied biomass. In this work, two process pathways were assessed for energy and mass balance in making torrefied pellets from softwood chips and qualities of the resulting torrefied pellets were compared. Pathway I involve drying the wood chips, torrefaction, grinding followed by densification. In pathway II, wood chips were dried, ground, densified and finally torrefied. The results showed that it was difficult to bind the torrefied biomass particles and a binding agent was necessary to enable their effective pelletisation with reasonable energy consumption. In contrary, pelletization of raw materials was possible without using binding agents and when the "raw wood pellets" were torrefied, the pellets surprisingly stayed intact and had several promising properties such as higher energy/carbon value, reduced moisture content and higher stability in water. In addition, the pathway II was more efficient in terms of overall energy and material balance.
KW - Biomass
KW - Densification
KW - Densified biocoal
KW - Torrefaction
KW - Torrefied pellet
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906485508&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906485508&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.07.076
DO - 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.07.076
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84906485508
VL - 134
SP - 133
EP - 142
JO - Applied Energy
JF - Applied Energy
SN - 0306-2619
ER -