Cross comparisons of CFD results of wind and dispersion fields for MUST experiment: Evaluation exercises by AIJ

Yoshihide Tominaga, Satoru Iizuka, Masashi Imano, Hiroto Kataoka, Akashi Mochida, Tsuyoshi Nozu, Yoshiyuki Ono, Taichi Shirasawa, Naoya Tsuchiya, Ryuichiro Yoshie

研究成果: Article査読

10 被引用数 (Scopus)

抄録

In order to apply Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) techniques to estimate pollutant dispersion in urban areas, it is important to assess the performance of numerical models used to estimate these phenomena. Recently, the MUST (Mock Urban Setting Test) has often been adopted as a test case for evaluating numerical models for micro-scale urban meteorology. This paper presents the results of model evaluation exercises carried out using MUST based on the Architectural Institute of Japan (AIJ) experience. The results of model evaluation exercises conducted by AIJ are broadly consistent with the results obtained by the COST group. However, the variety of results by each computation can be minimized by setting standard computational conditions. All computations including both RANS and LES show good agreement with wind experiment data. In general, LES cases show comparable accuracy to RANS in predicting U and W. However, LES shows better agreement than RANS in TKE and concentration.

本文言語English
ページ(範囲)117-124
ページ数8
ジャーナルJournal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering
12
1
DOI
出版ステータスPublished - 2013 5月 15

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • 土木構造工学
  • 建築
  • カルチュラル スタディーズ
  • 建築および建設
  • 人文科学(その他)

フィンガープリント

「Cross comparisons of CFD results of wind and dispersion fields for MUST experiment: Evaluation exercises by AIJ」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。

引用スタイル