TY - JOUR
T1 - Conceptions of Freedom of Speech in Youth and College Students
AU - Hasegawa, Mari
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - Two studies were conducted to investigate the conception of freedom of speech in youth and college students. Participants in Study 1 were 207 elementary and middle school students (4th, 6th, and 8th grades) and 75 college students. The data revealed that (a) the participants recognized the importance of freedom of speech; (b) they understood its features in general; (c) when making judgments, they considered only the content of the speech (moral, conventional, prudential, or personal), and not the type of audience (adults, children); (d) there were age differences in judgments among the 4th, 6th, and 8th graders in the content of the conventional, prudential, and personal domains; (e) they did not differentiate 2 types of judgments (permission for certain speeches and the legitimacy of legal prohibition); and (f) judgments were associated with grade in school, justifications used to support freedom of speech in general questions, and judgments about violations of hypothetical laws restricting freedom of speech. The findings of Study 2, in which the participants were 97 elementary and middle school students (4th, 6th, and 8th grades), supported the view that there were age differences in the judgments.
AB - Two studies were conducted to investigate the conception of freedom of speech in youth and college students. Participants in Study 1 were 207 elementary and middle school students (4th, 6th, and 8th grades) and 75 college students. The data revealed that (a) the participants recognized the importance of freedom of speech; (b) they understood its features in general; (c) when making judgments, they considered only the content of the speech (moral, conventional, prudential, or personal), and not the type of audience (adults, children); (d) there were age differences in judgments among the 4th, 6th, and 8th graders in the content of the conventional, prudential, and personal domains; (e) they did not differentiate 2 types of judgments (permission for certain speeches and the legitimacy of legal prohibition); and (f) judgments were associated with grade in school, justifications used to support freedom of speech in general questions, and judgments about violations of hypothetical laws restricting freedom of speech. The findings of Study 2, in which the participants were 97 elementary and middle school students (4th, 6th, and 8th grades), supported the view that there were age differences in the judgments.
KW - Adolescents
KW - Children
KW - Freedom of speech
KW - Human rights
KW - Moral
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035590871&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035590871&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5926/jjep1953.49.1_91
DO - 10.5926/jjep1953.49.1_91
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0035590871
SN - 0021-5015
VL - 49
SP - 91
EP - 101
JO - Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology
JF - Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology
IS - 1
ER -