TY - JOUR
T1 - Competing exchange interactions and magnetic anisotropy of La1−xTbxMn2Si2
AU - Gerasimov, E. G.
AU - Mushnikov, N. V.
AU - Terentev, P. B.
AU - Yazovskikh, K. A.
AU - Titov, I. S.
AU - Gaviko, V. S.
AU - Umetsu, Rie Y.
PY - 2017/1/15
Y1 - 2017/1/15
N2 - Crystal structure, magnetization and magnetic susceptibility have been studied for the La1−xTbxMn2Si2 (0≤x≤1) polycrystalline and quasi-single crystalline samples. It has been shown that, at low temperature T =4.2 K, substitution of the terbium for lanthanum leads to recurred change of the type of interlayer Mn-Mn magnetic ordering. For the compounds with x<0.2 ≈ xc1 the manganese magnetic moments of adjacent layers are ordered ferromagnetically, in the concentration range 0.2c2 (the critical concentration xc2 is between 0.4 and 0.6) the antiferromagnetic order is realized, while for x>xc2 the Mn sublattice is again ferromagnetically ordered and, due to the negative Tb–Mn interaction, ferrimagnetic structure is formed. Using the magnetization data, the concentration magnetic phase diagram has been suggested. The observed variation of the type of magnetic ordering has been explained in terms of the change of interatomic Mn-Mn distances and a competition of the Tb–Mn, Mn–Mn and Tb–Tb interlayer exchange interactions.
AB - Crystal structure, magnetization and magnetic susceptibility have been studied for the La1−xTbxMn2Si2 (0≤x≤1) polycrystalline and quasi-single crystalline samples. It has been shown that, at low temperature T =4.2 K, substitution of the terbium for lanthanum leads to recurred change of the type of interlayer Mn-Mn magnetic ordering. For the compounds with x<0.2 ≈ xc1 the manganese magnetic moments of adjacent layers are ordered ferromagnetically, in the concentration range 0.2c2 (the critical concentration xc2 is between 0.4 and 0.6) the antiferromagnetic order is realized, while for x>xc2 the Mn sublattice is again ferromagnetically ordered and, due to the negative Tb–Mn interaction, ferrimagnetic structure is formed. Using the magnetization data, the concentration magnetic phase diagram has been suggested. The observed variation of the type of magnetic ordering has been explained in terms of the change of interatomic Mn-Mn distances and a competition of the Tb–Mn, Mn–Mn and Tb–Tb interlayer exchange interactions.
KW - Exchange interaction
KW - Magnetic anisotropy
KW - Magnetic phase diagram
KW - Magnetic phase transition
KW - Rare-earth intermetallics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84985994371&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84985994371&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.09.012
DO - 10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.09.012
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84985994371
VL - 422
SP - 237
EP - 242
JO - Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials
JF - Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials
SN - 0304-8853
ER -