TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of treatment invasiveness between upfront debulking surgery versus interval debulking surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III/IV ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancers in a phase III randomised trial
T2 - Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0602
AU - Japan Clinical Oncology Group
AU - Onda, Takashi
AU - Satoh, Toyomi
AU - Saito, Toshiaki
AU - Kasamatsu, Takahiro
AU - Nakanishi, Toru
AU - Nakamura, Kenichi
AU - Wakabayashi, Masashi
AU - Takehara, Kazuhiro
AU - Saito, Motoaki
AU - Ushijima, Kimio
AU - Kobayashi, Hiroaki
AU - Kawana, Kei
AU - Yokota, Harushige
AU - Takano, Masashi
AU - Takeshima, Nobuhiro
AU - Watanabe, Yoh
AU - Yaegashi, Nobuo
AU - Konishi, Ikuo
AU - Kamura, Toshiharu
AU - Yoshikawa, Hiroyuki
N1 - Funding Information:
The study was supported by Health Sciences Research Grants for the Third-Term Comprehensive Control Research for Cancer ( H16-035 ), Health Sciences Research Grants for Clinical Cancer Research ( H19-028 , H22-020 ), Grants-in Aid for Cancer Research ( 17S-1 , 17S-5 , 18-06 , 20S-1 , 20S-6 ) from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan , and the National Cancer Center Research and Development Funds ( 23-A-16 , 23-A-17 and 26-A-4 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2016/9/1
Y1 - 2016/9/1
N2 - Background We conducted a phase III, non-inferiority trial comparing upfront primary debulking surgery (PDS) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for stage III/IV ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancers (JCOG0602). Two earlier studies, EORTC55971 and CHORUS, demonstrated non-inferior survival of patients treated with NAC. However, they could not evaluate true treatment invasiveness because of adding diagnostic laparotomy or laparoscopy before treatment in over 30% of both arms of EORTC55971 and in 16% of NAC arm of CHORUS. Methods Patients were randomised into the standard arm (PDS followed by eight cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin [TC]) and NAC arm (four cycles of TC, IDS, and four cycles of TC). In the standard arm, IDS was optional for patients who had undergone suboptimal or incomplete PDS. Treatment invasiveness was compared between arms (UMIN000000523). Results Between November 2006 and October 2011, 301 patients were randomised. In the standard arm, 147/149 underwent PDS and 49 underwent IDS. In the NAC arm, 130/152 underwent IDS. The NAC arm required fewer surgeries (mean 0.86 versus 1.32, p < 0.001) and shorter total operation time (median 273 min versus 341 min, p < 0.001) than the standard arm and required a lower frequency of abdominal organ resection (23.7% versus 37.6%, p = 0.012) or distant metastases resection (3.9% versus 10.7%, p = 0.027). In the NAC arm IDS, blood/ascites loss was smaller (median 787 ml versus 3235 ml, p < 0.001) and albumin transfusion and G3/4 adverse events after surgery in total were less frequent (26.2% versus 58.5%, p < 0.001; 4.6% versus 15.0%, p = 0.005, respectively). Conclusion Our findings demonstrated that NAC treatment is less invasive than standard treatment. NAC treatment may become the new standard treatment for advanced ovarian cancer when non-inferior survival is confirmed in the planned primary analysis in 2017.
AB - Background We conducted a phase III, non-inferiority trial comparing upfront primary debulking surgery (PDS) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for stage III/IV ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancers (JCOG0602). Two earlier studies, EORTC55971 and CHORUS, demonstrated non-inferior survival of patients treated with NAC. However, they could not evaluate true treatment invasiveness because of adding diagnostic laparotomy or laparoscopy before treatment in over 30% of both arms of EORTC55971 and in 16% of NAC arm of CHORUS. Methods Patients were randomised into the standard arm (PDS followed by eight cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin [TC]) and NAC arm (four cycles of TC, IDS, and four cycles of TC). In the standard arm, IDS was optional for patients who had undergone suboptimal or incomplete PDS. Treatment invasiveness was compared between arms (UMIN000000523). Results Between November 2006 and October 2011, 301 patients were randomised. In the standard arm, 147/149 underwent PDS and 49 underwent IDS. In the NAC arm, 130/152 underwent IDS. The NAC arm required fewer surgeries (mean 0.86 versus 1.32, p < 0.001) and shorter total operation time (median 273 min versus 341 min, p < 0.001) than the standard arm and required a lower frequency of abdominal organ resection (23.7% versus 37.6%, p = 0.012) or distant metastases resection (3.9% versus 10.7%, p = 0.027). In the NAC arm IDS, blood/ascites loss was smaller (median 787 ml versus 3235 ml, p < 0.001) and albumin transfusion and G3/4 adverse events after surgery in total were less frequent (26.2% versus 58.5%, p < 0.001; 4.6% versus 15.0%, p = 0.005, respectively). Conclusion Our findings demonstrated that NAC treatment is less invasive than standard treatment. NAC treatment may become the new standard treatment for advanced ovarian cancer when non-inferior survival is confirmed in the planned primary analysis in 2017.
KW - Interval debulking surgery
KW - Neoadjuvant therapy
KW - Ovarian neoplasms
KW - Primary debulking surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84975318119&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84975318119&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.05.017
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.05.017
M3 - Article
C2 - 27323348
AN - SCOPUS:84975318119
SN - 0959-8049
VL - 64
SP - 22
EP - 31
JO - European Journal of Cancer
JF - European Journal of Cancer
ER -