TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of the fall rate and structure of recent T-7 XBT manufactured by Sippican and TSK

AU - Kizu, S.

AU - Sukigara, C.

AU - Hanawa, K.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - The fall rate of recent T-7 expendable bathythermograph (XBT; 760 m) is evaluated based on a series of concurrent measurement with a calibrated Conductivity Temperature Depth profiler (CTD) in the sea east of Japan. An emphasis is placed on comparing the fall rates of T-7 produced by the two present manufacturers, the Lockheed Martin Sippican Inc., and the Tsurumi Seiki Co. Ltd., which have been believed to be identical but had never been compared directly. It is found that the two manufacturers T-7 fall at rates different by about 3.5%. The Sippican T-7 falls slower than given by the fall-rate equation (FRE) of Hanawa et al. (1995) by about 2.1%, and the TSK T-7 falls faster by about 1.4%. The fall-rate coefficients estimated based on the sea test by applying the equation of traditional quadratic form, d(t)=at-bt2 where d is depth in meters and t is the time elapsed, in seconds, are a =6.553 (m s-1) and b=0.00221 (m s-2) for the LMS T-7, and a =6.803 (m s-1) and b=0.00242 (m s-2) for the TSK T-7. By detail examination of the probes, we found that the two companies T-7 have different total weight and many structural differences. Because the difference in the fall rate is about twice larger than the difference in weight (about 2%), it is inferred that the structural differences give sizable impact to the difference in their fall rates. Our results clearly show that the recent T-7 of the two companies needs to be discriminated.

AB - The fall rate of recent T-7 expendable bathythermograph (XBT; 760 m) is evaluated based on a series of concurrent measurement with a calibrated Conductivity Temperature Depth profiler (CTD) in the sea east of Japan. An emphasis is placed on comparing the fall rates of T-7 produced by the two present manufacturers, the Lockheed Martin Sippican Inc., and the Tsurumi Seiki Co. Ltd., which have been believed to be identical but had never been compared directly. It is found that the two manufacturers T-7 fall at rates different by about 3.5%. The Sippican T-7 falls slower than given by the fall-rate equation (FRE) of Hanawa et al. (1995) by about 2.1%, and the TSK T-7 falls faster by about 1.4%. The fall-rate coefficients estimated based on the sea test by applying the equation of traditional quadratic form, d(t)=at-bt2 where d is depth in meters and t is the time elapsed, in seconds, are a =6.553 (m s-1) and b=0.00221 (m s-2) for the LMS T-7, and a =6.803 (m s-1) and b=0.00242 (m s-2) for the TSK T-7. By detail examination of the probes, we found that the two companies T-7 have different total weight and many structural differences. Because the difference in the fall rate is about twice larger than the difference in weight (about 2%), it is inferred that the structural differences give sizable impact to the difference in their fall rates. Our results clearly show that the recent T-7 of the two companies needs to be discriminated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79953812605&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79953812605&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5194/os-7-231-2011

DO - 10.5194/os-7-231-2011

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79953812605

VL - 7

SP - 231

EP - 244

JO - Ocean Science

JF - Ocean Science

SN - 1812-0784

IS - 2

ER -