TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of survival between primary debulking surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III/IV ovarian, tubal and peritoneal cancers in phase III randomised trial
AU - Japan Clinical Oncology Group
AU - Onda, Takashi
AU - Satoh, Toyomi
AU - Ogawa, Gakuto
AU - Saito, Toshiaki
AU - Kasamatsu, Takahiro
AU - Nakanishi, Toru
AU - Mizutani, Tomonori
AU - Takehara, Kazuhiro
AU - Okamoto, Aikou
AU - Ushijima, Kimio
AU - Kobayashi, Hiroaki
AU - Kawana, Kei
AU - Yokota, Harushige
AU - Takano, Masashi
AU - Kanao, Hiroyuki
AU - Watanabe, Yoh
AU - Yamamoto, Kaichiro
AU - Yaegashi, Nobuo
AU - Kamura, Toshiharu
AU - Yoshikawa, Hiroyuki
N1 - Funding Information:
The study was supported by Health Sciences Research Grants for the Third-Term Comprehensive Control Research for Cancer ( H16-035 ), Health Sciences Research Grants for Clinical Cancer Research ( H19–028 , H22-020 ), Grants-in Aid for Cancer Research ( 17S-1 , 17S-5 , 18-06 , 20S-1 , 20S-6 ) from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan , and the National Cancer Center Research and Development Funds ( 23-A-16 , 23-A-17 , 26-A-4 , and 29-A-3 ).
Funding Information:
TO1 received grant and personal fee from Chugai, grants from Kaken, Taiho, Daiichi-Sankyo, Mochida, and Meiji Yasuda Health Development Foundation, and personal fees from AstraZeneca and Ono outside the submitted work. TS2 reported personal fees from Mochida, Nippon Kayaku, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Kyowa Kirin, AstraZeneca, Kaken, Eisai, Tsumura, Beyer, and Aska outside the submitted work. TS4 reported grants and personal fees from Chugai and Nippon Kayaku, and grants from Taiho and Yakult outside the submitted work. KT7 reported other financial activities from AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Chugai, and Eisai outside the submitted work. AO8 reported other financial activities from Taiho, Meiji, Fuji, Nippon Shinyaku, Novartis, Mochida, Chugai, Tsumura, Pfizer, Kissei, Shionogi, Daiichi Sankyo, Kaken, GenoDive, CMIC, and Shinnihonseiyaku, and personal fee from AstraZeneca outside the submitted work. KU9 received grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, MSD, Chugai, Kaken, Takeda, Nippon Kayaku, Mochida, and Tsumura, and grants from Abbvie, Ono, and Eisai, and personal fees from Taiho, Yakult, Kyowa Kirin, Bayer, and Aska outside the submitted work. HY12 received grants from MSD and Zeria, and personal fees from Kaken, Ono, AstraZeneca and Chugai, and Pfizer outside the submitted work. TK18 reported a personal fee from BrightPath Biotherapeutics outside the submitted work. HY19 reported personal fees from Ono, Taiho, MSD, and GSK outside the submitted work. GO3, TK5, TM3, TN6, HK10, KK11, MT13, HK14, YW15, KY16, NY17 reported no competing interests.Participating institutions:, Hokkaido University Hospital; Sapporo Medical University; Iwate Medical University; Tohoku University Hospital; Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba; National Defense Medical College; Saitama Cancer Center; Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University; Jikei Kashiwa Hospital; National Cancer Center Hospital; Jikei University Hospital; Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research; The University of Tokyo Hospital; Juntendo University Hospital; Kitasato University School of Medicine; Niigata Cancer Center Hospital; Shinshu University School of Medicine; Aichi Cancer Center Hospital; Nagoya University School of Medicine; Kyoto University Hospital; Osaka City University Hospital; Kindai University Faculty of Medicine; Osaka Prefectural Hospital Organization Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases; Osaka City General Hospital; Sakai Hospital, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine; Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University; National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center Chugoku Cancer Center; National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center; National Kyushu Cancer Center; Kurume University School of Medicine; Kyushu University Hospital; Faculty of Medicine, Saga University; Kagoshima City Hospital; University of the Ryukyus Hospital. JCOG Data Center and Operations Office:, H. Fukuda (Data Center Director), J. Mizusawa (Statistical Section), K. Kubota (Data Management Section), J. Eba, (Operations Office). Funding source, The study was supported by Health Sciences Research Grants for the Third-Term Comprehensive Control Research for Cancer (H16-035), Health Sciences Research Grants for Clinical Cancer Research (H19?028, H22-020), Grants-in Aid for Cancer Research (17S-1, 17S-5, 18-06, 20S-1, 20S-6) from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan, and the National Cancer Center Research and Development Funds (23-A-16, 23-A-17, 26-A-4, and 29-A-3). Role of the funding source, The funders had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/5
Y1 - 2020/5
N2 - Background: Regarding the comparison between primary debulking surgery (PDS) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for stage III/IV ovarian, tubal and peritoneal cancers, EORTC55971 and CHORUS studies demonstrated noninferiority of NACT. Previously, we reported reduced invasiveness of NACT in JCOG0602. This is a final analysis including the primary endpoint of overall survival (OS). Methods: Patients were randomised to PDS (PDS followed by 8x paclitaxel and carboplatin, i.e. TC regimen) or NACT (4x TC, interval debulking surgery [IDS], 4x TC). The primary endpoint was OS. The noninferiority hazard ratio (HR) margin for NACT compared with PDS was 1·161. The planned sample size was 300. Findings: Between 2006 and 2011, 301 patients were randomised, 149 to PDS and 152 to NACT. The median OS was 49·0 and 44·3 months in the PDS and NACT. HR for NACT was 1·052 [90·8% confidence interval (CI) 0·835–1·326], and one-sided noninferiority p-value was 0·24. Median progression-free survival was 15·1 and 16·4 months in the PDS and NACT (HR: 0·96 [95%CI 0·75–1·23]). In the PDS arm, 147/149 underwent PDS and 49/147 underwent IDS. In the NACT arm 130/152 underwent IDS. Complete resection was achieved in 12% (17/147) of PDS and 31% (45/147) of PDS ± IDS in the PDS arm and in 64% (83/130) of IDS in the NACT arm. Optimal surgery (residual tumour <1 cm) was achieved in 37% (55/147), 63% (92/147), and 82% (107/130 respectively. In the NACT, PS 2/3, serum albumin ≤2·5, CA125 > 2000 an institution with low study activity was advantageous, whereas clear/mucinous histology was disadvantageous for OS. Interpretation: The noninferiority of NACT was not confirmed. NACT may not always be a substitute for PDS. However, as our study had smaller numbers, the noninferiority of the previous studies cannot be denied. Funding: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan and the National Cancer Center, Japan. Clinical trial information: UMIN000000523.
AB - Background: Regarding the comparison between primary debulking surgery (PDS) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for stage III/IV ovarian, tubal and peritoneal cancers, EORTC55971 and CHORUS studies demonstrated noninferiority of NACT. Previously, we reported reduced invasiveness of NACT in JCOG0602. This is a final analysis including the primary endpoint of overall survival (OS). Methods: Patients were randomised to PDS (PDS followed by 8x paclitaxel and carboplatin, i.e. TC regimen) or NACT (4x TC, interval debulking surgery [IDS], 4x TC). The primary endpoint was OS. The noninferiority hazard ratio (HR) margin for NACT compared with PDS was 1·161. The planned sample size was 300. Findings: Between 2006 and 2011, 301 patients were randomised, 149 to PDS and 152 to NACT. The median OS was 49·0 and 44·3 months in the PDS and NACT. HR for NACT was 1·052 [90·8% confidence interval (CI) 0·835–1·326], and one-sided noninferiority p-value was 0·24. Median progression-free survival was 15·1 and 16·4 months in the PDS and NACT (HR: 0·96 [95%CI 0·75–1·23]). In the PDS arm, 147/149 underwent PDS and 49/147 underwent IDS. In the NACT arm 130/152 underwent IDS. Complete resection was achieved in 12% (17/147) of PDS and 31% (45/147) of PDS ± IDS in the PDS arm and in 64% (83/130) of IDS in the NACT arm. Optimal surgery (residual tumour <1 cm) was achieved in 37% (55/147), 63% (92/147), and 82% (107/130 respectively. In the NACT, PS 2/3, serum albumin ≤2·5, CA125 > 2000 an institution with low study activity was advantageous, whereas clear/mucinous histology was disadvantageous for OS. Interpretation: The noninferiority of NACT was not confirmed. NACT may not always be a substitute for PDS. However, as our study had smaller numbers, the noninferiority of the previous studies cannot be denied. Funding: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan and the National Cancer Center, Japan. Clinical trial information: UMIN000000523.
KW - Interval debulking surgery
KW - Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
KW - Ovarian neoplasms
KW - Primary debulking surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081208471&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85081208471&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.02.020
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.02.020
M3 - Article
C2 - 32179446
AN - SCOPUS:85081208471
SN - 0959-8049
VL - 130
SP - 114
EP - 125
JO - European Journal of Cancer
JF - European Journal of Cancer
ER -