Comparison of magnetic field analysis methods considering magnetic anisotropy

Teruyuki Tamaki, Keisuke Fujisaki, Kiyoshi Wajima, Koji Fujiwara

研究成果: Article査読

16 被引用数 (Scopus)

抄録

The magnetic field analysis results on grain-oriented silicon steel sheet and nongrain-oriented silicon steel sheet by the isotropic method, the two-axis isotropic method, the two-axis anisotropic method, the ψ anisotropic method, and the θHB anisotropic method, which are 2-D magnetic analysis methods, are compared. In analyzing the magnetic field in the isotropic material, the isotropic method is more appropriate than the two-axis isotropic method. For the anisotropic material in which the magnetic flux density is much less than saturation magnetic flux density, the two-axis anisotropic method is more preferable than the ψ anisotropic method, because the result of the two-axis anisotropic method is similar to that of the θHB anisotropic method. However, for the analysis in high magnetic flux density near the saturation magnetic flux density, the ψ anisotropic method is more suitable than the two-axis anisotropic method.

本文言語English
論文番号5393227
ページ(範囲)187-190
ページ数4
ジャーナルIEEE Transactions on Magnetics
46
2
DOI
出版ステータスPublished - 2010 2

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • 電子材料、光学材料、および磁性材料
  • 電子工学および電気工学

フィンガープリント

「Comparison of magnetic field analysis methods considering magnetic anisotropy」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。

引用スタイル