TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparing intensities and modalities within the sensory attenuation paradigm
T2 - Preliminary evidence
AU - Burin, Dalila
AU - Battaglini, Alvise
AU - Pia, Lorenzo
AU - Falvo, Giusy
AU - Palombella, Mattia
AU - Salatino, Adriana
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017
PY - 2017/11
Y1 - 2017/11
N2 - It is well-documented that the intensity of a self-generated somatosensory stimulus is perceived to be attenuated in respect to an identical stimulus generated by others. At present, it is not clear whether such a phenomenon, known as somatosensory attenuation, is based not only on feedforward motor signals but also on re-afferences towards the body. To answer this question, in the present pilot investigation on twelve healthy subjects, three types of stimulations (sensory non-nociceptive electrical – ES, nociceptive electrical – NES, and vibrotactile – VTS) and intensities (1 = sensory threshold ∗ 2.5 + 2 mA, 2 = sensory threshold ∗ 2.5 + 3 mA, 3 = sensory threshold ∗ 2.5 + 4 mA for ES and NES; 1 = sensory threshold ∗ 2 Hz, 2 = sensory threshold ∗ 3 Hz, 3 = sensory threshold ∗ 4 Hz for VTS) have been directly compared in a somatosensory attenuation paradigm. The results show that the attenuation effect emerged only with electrical stimuli and that it increased with higher intensities. These pilot findings suggest that, depending on the type and the intensity of stimulation, re-afferences can have a role in somatosensory attenuation. Additionally, it is possible to speculate the effect is present only with electrical stimuli because those stimuli are prospectively judged as potentially dangerous. This, in turn, would optimize planning successful reactions to incoming threatening stimuli.
AB - It is well-documented that the intensity of a self-generated somatosensory stimulus is perceived to be attenuated in respect to an identical stimulus generated by others. At present, it is not clear whether such a phenomenon, known as somatosensory attenuation, is based not only on feedforward motor signals but also on re-afferences towards the body. To answer this question, in the present pilot investigation on twelve healthy subjects, three types of stimulations (sensory non-nociceptive electrical – ES, nociceptive electrical – NES, and vibrotactile – VTS) and intensities (1 = sensory threshold ∗ 2.5 + 2 mA, 2 = sensory threshold ∗ 2.5 + 3 mA, 3 = sensory threshold ∗ 2.5 + 4 mA for ES and NES; 1 = sensory threshold ∗ 2 Hz, 2 = sensory threshold ∗ 3 Hz, 3 = sensory threshold ∗ 4 Hz for VTS) have been directly compared in a somatosensory attenuation paradigm. The results show that the attenuation effect emerged only with electrical stimuli and that it increased with higher intensities. These pilot findings suggest that, depending on the type and the intensity of stimulation, re-afferences can have a role in somatosensory attenuation. Additionally, it is possible to speculate the effect is present only with electrical stimuli because those stimuli are prospectively judged as potentially dangerous. This, in turn, would optimize planning successful reactions to incoming threatening stimuli.
KW - Electrostimulation
KW - Nociceptive stimulation
KW - Self-generated stimuli
KW - Somatosensory attenuation
KW - Vibrotactile stimulation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027879665&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027879665&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jare.2017.08.001
DO - 10.1016/j.jare.2017.08.001
M3 - Article
C2 - 28861281
AN - SCOPUS:85027879665
VL - 8
SP - 649
EP - 653
JO - Journal of Advanced Research
JF - Journal of Advanced Research
SN - 2090-1232
IS - 6
ER -