TY - JOUR
T1 - Affective impressions and memorability of color-form combinations
AU - Sakuta, Yuiko
AU - Gyoba, Jiro
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was funded by a Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research, sponsoring Jiro Gyoba. This manuscript was edited by Ms. K. Miller, Royal English Language Centre, Fukuoka, Japan.
PY - 2006/4
Y1 - 2006/4
N2 - In this study the authors investigate how various impressions affect the recognition of color-form pairs. They performed a preliminary study, a main study of impression rating using the semantic differential method, and a recognition experiment. On the basis of the preliminary study, the authors chose 14 appropriate pairs of adjectives and 48 color and form stimuli and used them for the main study. Factor analysis of the main study extracted three factors: Activity, Potency, and Evaluation. In the recognition test, the authors found that color-form pairs with congruent impressions in Activity or Potency were more easily recognized than pairs with incongruent impressions. In contrast, pairs with incongruent impressions in Evaluation were recognized more easily than congruent pairs. These results are discussed in relation to the assumed network representations of affective impressions that have different characteristics depending on the three factors.
AB - In this study the authors investigate how various impressions affect the recognition of color-form pairs. They performed a preliminary study, a main study of impression rating using the semantic differential method, and a recognition experiment. On the basis of the preliminary study, the authors chose 14 appropriate pairs of adjectives and 48 color and form stimuli and used them for the main study. Factor analysis of the main study extracted three factors: Activity, Potency, and Evaluation. In the recognition test, the authors found that color-form pairs with congruent impressions in Activity or Potency were more easily recognized than pairs with incongruent impressions. In contrast, pairs with incongruent impressions in Evaluation were recognized more easily than congruent pairs. These results are discussed in relation to the assumed network representations of affective impressions that have different characteristics depending on the three factors.
KW - Color and form
KW - Impression
KW - Recognition memory
KW - Semantic differential method
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646733482&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646733482&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3200/GENP.133.2.191-207
DO - 10.3200/GENP.133.2.191-207
M3 - Article
C2 - 16705912
AN - SCOPUS:33646733482
VL - 133
SP - 191
EP - 207
JO - Journal of General Psychology
JF - Journal of General Psychology
SN - 0022-1309
IS - 2
ER -