Background. Although a few reports indicated some benefit to survival, the effect of adjuvant therapy for the patients with resected lung cancer was still controversial. The aim of our study was to evaluate survival advantage of CDDP-based adjuvant therapy compared with short-term immunochemotherapy. Methods. Experimental design: prospective randomized trial. Patients: from 1990 through 1994, 94 patients were registered. Forty-seven patients were randomly assigned to each group, i.e., CDDP-based therapy group (CB Group, CDDP+VDS+tegafur+OK-432 or CDDP+OK-432+mediastinal irradiation) or immunochemotherapy group (IC Group, tegafur+OK-432). Patients in both groups were followed at 4-month intervals with the routine follow-up program of our department. Results. No significant difference was observed between the patients' characteristics of two groups. Compliance of the regimen in each group was 79% in CB Group and 85% in IC Group. No treatment-related death was observed. Five-year survival rates of CB Group and IC Group were 49% and 51%, and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 46% and 44%, respectively. There were no statistical differences between the two groups. Furthermore, no survival differences could be found between CB Group and IC Group in any subgroup of patients. Conclusions. Both of these regimens were feasible. However, we have not observed any survival benefit in the CB Group in any subgroup, so far. Induction therapy, new chemotherapeutic agents, or anti-angiogenetic agents may improve the survival of surgically treated lung cancer patients.
|ジャーナル||Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery|
|出版ステータス||Published - 2000 12 1|
ASJC Scopus subject areas