## 抄録

Let φ be an acceptable programming system/numbering of the partial computable functions: ℕ = {0; 1; 2; …} →ℕ, where, for p ∈ ℕ N, φ_{p} is the partial computable function computed by program p of the φ-system and W_{p} = domain(φ_{p}). Wp is, then, the computably enumerable (c.e.) set accepted by p. The first author taught in a class a recursion theorem proof employing a pair of cases that, for each q, {x | φ_{x} = φ_{q}} is not computably enumerable. The particular pair of cases employed was: domain(φ_{q}) is infinite vs. finite - incidentally, by Rice's Theorem, a non-constructive disjunction. Some student asked why the proof involved an analysis by cases. The answer given straightaway to the student was that his teacher didn't know how else to do it. The present paper provides, among other things, a better answer: any proof that, for each q, {x | φ_{x} = φ_{q}} is not c.e. provably must involve some such non-constructiveness. Furthermore, completely characterized are all the possible such pairs of (index set based) cases that will work. Along the way, relevantly explored are uniform lifts of the concept completely productive (abbr: c-productive) sets to sequences of sets. The c-productive sets are the effectively non-c.e. sets. A set sequence S_{q}, q ∈ ℕ, is said to be uniformly c-productive iff there is a computable f so that, for all q, x, f(q, x) is a counterexample to S_{q} = W_{x}. Relevance: a completely constructive proof that each S_{q} is not c.e. would entail the Sqs forming a uniformly c-productive sequence. Relevantly shown, then, is that the sequence {x | φ_{x} = φ_{q}}, q ∈ ℕ, is not uniformly c-productive | and this even though, of course, the set {‹q, x›| φ_{x} = φ_{q}} is c-productive. For some results we provide upper and/or lower bounds for them as to position in the Arithmetical Hierarchy of the Law of Excluded Middle needed in addition to Heyting Arithmetic. Results are also obtained for similar problems, including for run-time bounded programming systems and other subrecursive systems. Proof methods include recursion theorems.

本文言語 | English |
---|---|

ホスト出版物のタイトル | Proceedings of the 13th Asian Logic Conference, ALC 2013 |

編集者 | Xishun Zhao, Qi Feng, Byunghan Kim, Liang Yu |

出版社 | World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte Ltd |

ページ | 29-52 |

ページ数 | 24 |

ISBN（印刷版） | 9789814675994 |

DOI | |

出版ステータス | Published - 2013 |

イベント | 13th Asian Logic Conference, ALC 2013 - Guangzhou, China 継続期間: 2013 9 16 → 2013 9 20 |

### 出版物シリーズ

名前 | Proceedings of the 13th Asian Logic Conference, ALC 2013 |
---|

### Other

Other | 13th Asian Logic Conference, ALC 2013 |
---|---|

国/地域 | China |

City | Guangzhou |

Period | 13/9/16 → 13/9/20 |

## ASJC Scopus subject areas

- ハードウェアとアーキテクチャ
- コンピュータ ビジョンおよびパターン認識
- 計算理論と計算数学