TY - JOUR
T1 - X-ray photoelectron diffraction study of the initial stages of CVD diamond heteroepitaxy on Ir(001)/SrTiO3
AU - Kono, S.
AU - Shiraishi, M.
AU - Plusnin, N. I.
AU - Goto, T.
AU - Ikejima, Y.
AU - Abukawa, T.
AU - Shimomura, M.
AU - Dai, Z.
AU - Bednarski-Meinke, C.
AU - Golding, B.
PY - 2005/12/7
Y1 - 2005/12/7
N2 - Bias-treatment (BT) plays an important role in the heteroepitaxial growth of CVD diamond. In this study, an Ir(001)/SrTiO3 substrate was examined with X-ray photoelectron diffraction (XPD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), low energy electron diffraction (LEED), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and atomic force microscopy (AFM) after a BT process. XPD shows unambiguously that most carbon atoms following the BT process reside in an ordered form. In fact, the XPD patterns are very similar to those from a homoepitaxial CVD diamond (001) surface except for a somewhat smaller degree of angular intensity variation. XPD patterns of Ir 4d core levels from the BT substrate also showed that the short-range order of the Ir(001) crystal was preserved. However, LEED showed no diffraction spots, implying the absence of long-range order at a LEED coherence length greater than the typical one of ∼10 nm. These results prove that the 7-8 nm crystallites seen by SEM and AFM are indeed diamond (001) crystallites. The smaller degree of intensity variation in XPD patterns and the XPS intensity ratio of C 1s/Ir 4d indicates that the diamond crystallites have a height of ∼11 monolayers and are embedded in a disordered carbon matrix about 6 monolayers thick.
AB - Bias-treatment (BT) plays an important role in the heteroepitaxial growth of CVD diamond. In this study, an Ir(001)/SrTiO3 substrate was examined with X-ray photoelectron diffraction (XPD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), low energy electron diffraction (LEED), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and atomic force microscopy (AFM) after a BT process. XPD shows unambiguously that most carbon atoms following the BT process reside in an ordered form. In fact, the XPD patterns are very similar to those from a homoepitaxial CVD diamond (001) surface except for a somewhat smaller degree of angular intensity variation. XPD patterns of Ir 4d core levels from the BT substrate also showed that the short-range order of the Ir(001) crystal was preserved. However, LEED showed no diffraction spots, implying the absence of long-range order at a LEED coherence length greater than the typical one of ∼10 nm. These results prove that the 7-8 nm crystallites seen by SEM and AFM are indeed diamond (001) crystallites. The smaller degree of intensity variation in XPD patterns and the XPS intensity ratio of C 1s/Ir 4d indicates that the diamond crystallites have a height of ∼11 monolayers and are embedded in a disordered carbon matrix about 6 monolayers thick.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=28244499865&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=28244499865&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:28244499865
SN - 1344-9931
VL - 15
SP - 363
EP - 371
JO - New Diamond and Frontier Carbon Technology
JF - New Diamond and Frontier Carbon Technology
IS - 6
M1 - NDFCT 500
ER -