TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation of the diagnostic criteria for IgG4-related kidney disease (IgG4-RKD) 2011, and proposal of a new 2020 version
AU - Saeki, Takako
AU - Kawano, Mitsuhiro
AU - Nagasawa, Tasuku
AU - Ubara, Yoshifumi
AU - Taniguchi, Yoshinori
AU - Yanagita, Motoko
AU - Nishi, Shinichi
AU - Nagata, Michio
AU - Hisano, Satoshi
AU - Yamaguchi, Yutaka
AU - Nomura, Hideki
AU - Saito, Takao
AU - Nakashima, Hitoshi
N1 - Funding Information:
This study is one of the projects in IgG4-RKD Working Group in the Japanese Society of Nephrology. This work was supported in part by grants from Health and Labour Sciences Research Grants for the Study of Intractable Disease from Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan and the Japanese Society of Nephrology. We thank members of institutions affiliated with the IgG4-RKD working group as follows: Drs. I. Narita, Y. Wada, H. Sato, M. Sudo, N. Imai (Niigata University); M. Iwano, N. Takahashi (Fukui University); K. Yahata (National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center); H. Imamaki (Hirakata kohsai Hospital); Y. Tanaka, S. Kubo (University of Occupational and Environmental Health); A. Kawakami, M. Kitamura (Nagasaki University); N. Honma (Niigata prefectural Shibata Hospital). E. Kohno (Nagaoka Chuo General Hospital). We also thank Dr. I. Mizushima (Kanazawa University Hospital) for his helpful advice and discussion.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - Background: In 2011, the IgG4-related kidney disease (IgG4-RKD) working group of the Japanese Society of Nephrology proposed diagnostic criteria for IgG4-RKD. The aim of the present study was to validate those criteria and develop a revised version. Methods: Between April 2012 and May 2019, we retrospectively collected Japanese patients with kidney disease, for whom data on serum IgG4 values and/or immunohistological staining for IgG4 in renal biopsy samples were available. These patients were classified as IgG4-RKD or non-IgG4-RKD based on the diagnostic criteria for IgG4-RKD 2011, and the results were evaluated by expert opinion. Accordingly, we developed some revised versions of the criteria, and the version showing the best performance in the present cohort was proposed as the IgG4-RKD criteria for 2020. Results: Of 105 included patients, the expert panel diagnosed 55 as having true IgG4-RKD and 50 as mimickers. The diagnostic criteria for IgG4-RKD 2011 had a sensitivity of 72.7% and a specificity of 90.0% in this cohort. Of the 15 patients with true IgG4-RKD who were classified as non-IgG4-RKD, all lacked biopsy-proven extra-renal lesions, although many had clinical findings highly suggestive of IgG4-RD. The revised version to which “bilateral lacrimal, submandibular or parotid swelling, imaging findings compatible with type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis or retroperitoneal fibrosis” was added as an item pertaining to extra-renal organ(s) improved the sensitivity to 90.9% while the specificity remained at 90.0%. Conclusion: The revised version has considerably improved test performance after addition of the new extra-renal organ item (imaging and clinical findings).
AB - Background: In 2011, the IgG4-related kidney disease (IgG4-RKD) working group of the Japanese Society of Nephrology proposed diagnostic criteria for IgG4-RKD. The aim of the present study was to validate those criteria and develop a revised version. Methods: Between April 2012 and May 2019, we retrospectively collected Japanese patients with kidney disease, for whom data on serum IgG4 values and/or immunohistological staining for IgG4 in renal biopsy samples were available. These patients were classified as IgG4-RKD or non-IgG4-RKD based on the diagnostic criteria for IgG4-RKD 2011, and the results were evaluated by expert opinion. Accordingly, we developed some revised versions of the criteria, and the version showing the best performance in the present cohort was proposed as the IgG4-RKD criteria for 2020. Results: Of 105 included patients, the expert panel diagnosed 55 as having true IgG4-RKD and 50 as mimickers. The diagnostic criteria for IgG4-RKD 2011 had a sensitivity of 72.7% and a specificity of 90.0% in this cohort. Of the 15 patients with true IgG4-RKD who were classified as non-IgG4-RKD, all lacked biopsy-proven extra-renal lesions, although many had clinical findings highly suggestive of IgG4-RD. The revised version to which “bilateral lacrimal, submandibular or parotid swelling, imaging findings compatible with type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis or retroperitoneal fibrosis” was added as an item pertaining to extra-renal organ(s) improved the sensitivity to 90.9% while the specificity remained at 90.0%. Conclusion: The revised version has considerably improved test performance after addition of the new extra-renal organ item (imaging and clinical findings).
KW - Diagnostic criteria
KW - IgG4-related disease
KW - IgG4-related kidney disease
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098791135&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85098791135&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10157-020-01993-7
DO - 10.1007/s10157-020-01993-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 33398598
AN - SCOPUS:85098791135
SN - 1342-1751
VL - 25
SP - 99
EP - 109
JO - Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
JF - Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
IS - 2
ER -