Usefulness of non-lead aprons in radiation protection for physicians performing interventional procedures

Masayuki Zuguchi, Koichi Chida, Masaaki Taura, Yohei Inaba, Ayako Ebata, Shogo Yamada

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

At present, interventional radiology (IVR) tends to involve long procedures (long radiation duration), and physicians are near to the source of scattered radiation. Hence, shielding is critical in protecting physicians from radiation. Protective aprons and additional lead-shielding devices, such as tableside lead drapes, are important means of protecting the physician from scattered radiation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether non-lead aprons are effective in protecting physicians from radiation during IVR procedures. In this study, the radiation protection effects of commercially available protective lead and non-lead aprons, when exposed to diagnostic X rays, are compared. The performance of these non-lead and lead aprons was similar for scattered X rays at tube voltages of 60-120 kV. Properly designed non-lead aprons are thus more suitable for physicians because they weigh ∼20% less than the lead aprons, and are non-toxic.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)531-534
Number of pages4
JournalRadiation protection dosimetry
Volume131
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiation
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Usefulness of non-lead aprons in radiation protection for physicians performing interventional procedures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this