Abstract
Transport models are the main method to obtain physics information on the nuclear equation of state and in-medium properties of particles from low to relativistic-energy heavy-ion collisions. The Transport Model Evaluation Project (TMEP) has been pursued to test the robustness of transport model predictions in reaching consistent conclusions from the same type of physical model. To this end, calculations under controlled conditions of physical input and set-up were performed with various participating codes. These included both calculations of nuclear matter in a box with periodic boundary conditions, which test separately selected ingredients of a transport code, and more realistic calculations of heavy-ion collisions. Over the years, six studies have been performed within this project. In this intermediate review, we summarize and discuss the present status of the project. We also provide condensed descriptions of the 26 participating codes, which contributed to some part of the project. These include the major codes in use today. After a compact description of the underlying transport approaches, we review the main results of the studies completed so far. They show, that in box calculations the differences between the codes can be well understood and a convergence of the results can be reached. These studies also highlight the systematic differences between the two families of transport codes, known under the names of Boltzmann–Uehling–Uhlenbeck (BUU) and Quantum Molecular Dynamics (QMD) type codes. However, when the codes were compared in full heavy-ion collisions using different physical models, as recently for pion production, they still yielded substantially different results. This calls for further comparisons of heavy-ion collisions with controlled models and of box comparisons of important ingredients, like momentum-dependent fields, which are currently underway. Our evaluation studies often indicate improved strategies in performing transport simulations and thus can provide guidance to code developers. Results of transport simulations of heavy-ion collisions from a given code will have more significance if the code can be validated against benchmark calculations such as the ones summarized in this review.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 103962 |
Journal | Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics |
Volume | 125 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2022 Jul |
Keywords
- Heavy-ion collisions
- Intermediate energy
- Nuclear equation-of-state
- Transport codes
- Transport theory
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics
Access to Document
Other files and links
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Transport model comparison studies of intermediate-energy heavy-ion collisions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS
Transport model comparison studies of intermediate-energy heavy-ion collisions. / (TMEP collaboration).
In: Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, Vol. 125, 103962, 07.2022.Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Transport model comparison studies of intermediate-energy heavy-ion collisions
AU - (TMEP collaboration)
AU - Wolter, Hermann
AU - Colonna, Maria
AU - Cozma, Dan
AU - Danielewicz, Pawel
AU - Ko, Che Ming
AU - Kumar, Rohit
AU - Ono, Akira
AU - Tsang, Man Yee Betty
AU - Xu, Jun
AU - Zhang, Ying Xun
AU - Bratkovskaya, Elena
AU - Feng, Zhao Qing
AU - Gaitanos, Theodoros
AU - Le Fèvre, Arnaud
AU - Ikeno, Natsumi
AU - Kim, Youngman
AU - Mallik, Swagata
AU - Napolitani, Paolo
AU - Oliinychenko, Dmytro
AU - Ogawa, Tatsuhiko
AU - Papa, Massimo
AU - Su, Jun
AU - Wang, Rui
AU - Wang, Yong Jia
AU - Weil, Janus
AU - Zhang, Feng Shou
AU - Zhang, Guo Qiang
AU - Zhang, Zhen
AU - Aichelin, Joerg
AU - Cassing, Wolfgang
AU - Chen, Lie Wen
AU - Cheng, Hui Gan
AU - Elfner, Hannah
AU - Gallmeister, K.
AU - Hartnack, Christoph
AU - Hashimoto, Shintaro
AU - Jeon, Sangyong
AU - Kim, Kyungil
AU - Kim, Myungkuk
AU - Li, Bao An
AU - Lee, Chang Hwan
AU - Li, Qing Feng
AU - Li, Zhu Xia
AU - Mosel, Ulrich
AU - Nara, Yasushi
AU - Niita, Koji
AU - Ohnishi, Akira
AU - Sato, Tatsuhiko
AU - Song, Taesoo
AU - Sorensen, Agnieszka
N1 - Funding Information: L. W. Chen acknowledges the support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant no. 11625521 and the National SKA Program of China grant no. 2020SKA0120300 . P. Danielewicz acknowledges support from the US Department of Energy under grant no. DE-SC0019209 . S. Jeon is supported in part by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada . M. Kim and C.-H. Lee were supported by grants of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Korean government (Ministry of Science and ICT and Ministry of Education) (nos. 2016R1A5A1013277 and 2018R1D1A1B07048599). K. Kim and Y. Kim were supported by the Rare Isotope Science Project of Institute for Basic Science funded by Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning , and National Research Foundation of Korea ( 2013M7A1A1075764 ). C. M. Ko acknowledges the support by the US Department of Energy under award no. DE-SC0015266 and the Welch Foundation under grant no. A-1358 . R. Kumar and Betty Tsang acknowledge the support by the U.S. Department of Energy (Office of Science) under grant no. DE-SC0014530 . B.A. Li acknowledges the U.S. Department of Energy under award number DE-SC0013702 . P. Danielewicz, C.M. Ko, B.A. Li and Betty Tsang also acknowledge the CUSTIPEN (China–U.S. Theory Institute for Physics with Exotic Nuclei) under the US Department of Energy grant no. DE-SC0009971 . A. Ono acknowledges support from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI , grant nos. 24105008 , 17K05432 , and 21K03528 . A. Sorensen and D. Oliinychenko received support through the U.S. Department of Energy , under contract number DE-AC02-05CH11231 and received support within the framework of the Beam Energy Scan Theory (BEST) Topical Collaboration. M. B. Tsang acknowledges the support by the US National Science Foundation grant no. PHY-1565546 and the U.S. Department of Energy under grant nos. DE-SC0021235 , DE-SC0014530 , and DE-NA0003908. H. Wolter acknowledges support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy EXC-2094-390783311, ORIGINS. Y. J. Wang and Q.F. Li acknowledge support in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China grant nos. U2032145 , 11875125 and 12147219 , and partly by the National Key Research and Development Program of China under grant no. 2020YFE0202002 . J. Xu acknowledges the support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant no. 11922514 . F. S. Zhang acknowledges National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant nos. 12135004 , 11635003 , 11025524 , and 11161130520 . Y. X. Zhang acknowledges support in part by National Science Foundation of China grant nos. 11875323 , 11961141003 , 11475262 , and 11365004 , by the National Key Basic Research Development Program of China under grant no. 2018YFA0404404 , and by the Continuous Basic Scientific Research Project, China (nos. WDJC-2019-13 and BJ20002501 ). Z. Zhang acknowledges the support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant no. 11905302 . Z. Q. Feng acknowledges the support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant nos. 12175072 and 11722546 . Funding Information: The results and the publications of the TMEP project have been discussed at many video meetings especially in the last years with many participants, not all of whom are authors of this paper. In particular, we would like to thank William Lynch, Joe Natowitz, Christian Drischler, and Arnau Rios for very valuable contributions to these discussions. We also like to thank the hosts of meetings and conferences, who provided financial support to allow the writing group of the paper to meet before or after the main meetings. In particular, we thank the host institutions of the Symposium on Nuclear Symmetry Energy (NuSYM): the National Superconducting Laboratory (NSCL) at Michigan State University, USA (2013), IFJ-PAN and Jagellonian University, Krakow, Poland (2015), Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, (2016), the laboratory of GANIL, Caen, France (2017); the University of Busan, South Korea, (2018); the University of Hanoi, Vietnam (2019); and of the transport workshops at Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China (2014); Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, SINAP, Shanghai, China (2015); Beijing National University, Beijing, China (2016); NSCL at Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA (2017); the China Institute of Atomic Energy CIAE, Beijing, China (2017); the ECT* Center at Trento, Italy (2019); and Sun Yat Sen University, Zhuhai, China (2019); and we thank the Laboratori Nazionali del Sud (LNS), INFN, Catania, Italy, for support during the IWM-EC meeting 2018 and with computational resources. L. W. Chen acknowledges the support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant no. 11625521 and the National SKA Program of China grant no. 2020SKA0120300. P. Danielewicz acknowledges support from the US Department of Energy under grant no. DE-SC0019209. S. Jeon is supported in part by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. M. Kim and C.-H. Lee were supported by grants of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Korean government (Ministry of Science and ICT and Ministry of Education) (nos. 2016R1A5A1013277 and 2018R1D1A1B07048599). K. Kim and Y. Kim were supported by the Rare Isotope Science Project of Institute for Basic Science funded by Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, and National Research Foundation of Korea (2013M7A1A1075764). C. M. Ko acknowledges the support by the US Department of Energy under award no. DE-SC0015266 and the Welch Foundation under grant no. A-1358. R. Kumar and Betty Tsang acknowledge the support by the U.S. Department of Energy (Office of Science) under grant no. DE-SC0014530. B.A. Li acknowledges the U.S. Department of Energy under award number DE-SC0013702. P. Danielewicz, C.M. Ko, B.A. Li and Betty Tsang also acknowledge the CUSTIPEN (China–U.S. Theory Institute for Physics with Exotic Nuclei) under the US Department of Energy grant no. DE-SC0009971. A. Ono acknowledges support from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI, grant nos. 24105008, 17K05432, and 21K03528. A. Sorensen and D. Oliinychenko received support through the U.S. Department of Energy, under contract number DE-AC02-05CH11231 and received support within the framework of the Beam Energy Scan Theory (BEST) Topical Collaboration. M. B. Tsang acknowledges the support by the US National Science Foundation grant no. PHY-1565546 and the U.S. Department of Energy under grant nos. DE-SC0021235, DE-SC0014530, and DE-NA0003908. H. Wolter acknowledges support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy EXC-2094-390783311, ORIGINS. Y. J. Wang and Q.F. Li acknowledge support in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China grant nos. U2032145, 11875125 and 12147219, and partly by the National Key Research and Development Program of China under grant no. 2020YFE0202002. J. Xu acknowledges the support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant no. 11922514. F. S. Zhang acknowledges National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant nos. 12135004, 11635003, 11025524, and 11161130520. Y. X. Zhang acknowledges support in part by National Science Foundation of China grant nos. 11875323, 11961141003, 11475262, and 11365004, by the National Key Basic Research Development Program of China under grant no. 2018YFA0404404, and by the Continuous Basic Scientific Research Project, China (nos. WDJC-2019-13 and BJ20002501). Z. Zhang acknowledges the support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant no. 11905302. Z. Q. Feng acknowledges the support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant nos. 12175072 and 11722546. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2022/7
Y1 - 2022/7
N2 - Transport models are the main method to obtain physics information on the nuclear equation of state and in-medium properties of particles from low to relativistic-energy heavy-ion collisions. The Transport Model Evaluation Project (TMEP) has been pursued to test the robustness of transport model predictions in reaching consistent conclusions from the same type of physical model. To this end, calculations under controlled conditions of physical input and set-up were performed with various participating codes. These included both calculations of nuclear matter in a box with periodic boundary conditions, which test separately selected ingredients of a transport code, and more realistic calculations of heavy-ion collisions. Over the years, six studies have been performed within this project. In this intermediate review, we summarize and discuss the present status of the project. We also provide condensed descriptions of the 26 participating codes, which contributed to some part of the project. These include the major codes in use today. After a compact description of the underlying transport approaches, we review the main results of the studies completed so far. They show, that in box calculations the differences between the codes can be well understood and a convergence of the results can be reached. These studies also highlight the systematic differences between the two families of transport codes, known under the names of Boltzmann–Uehling–Uhlenbeck (BUU) and Quantum Molecular Dynamics (QMD) type codes. However, when the codes were compared in full heavy-ion collisions using different physical models, as recently for pion production, they still yielded substantially different results. This calls for further comparisons of heavy-ion collisions with controlled models and of box comparisons of important ingredients, like momentum-dependent fields, which are currently underway. Our evaluation studies often indicate improved strategies in performing transport simulations and thus can provide guidance to code developers. Results of transport simulations of heavy-ion collisions from a given code will have more significance if the code can be validated against benchmark calculations such as the ones summarized in this review.
AB - Transport models are the main method to obtain physics information on the nuclear equation of state and in-medium properties of particles from low to relativistic-energy heavy-ion collisions. The Transport Model Evaluation Project (TMEP) has been pursued to test the robustness of transport model predictions in reaching consistent conclusions from the same type of physical model. To this end, calculations under controlled conditions of physical input and set-up were performed with various participating codes. These included both calculations of nuclear matter in a box with periodic boundary conditions, which test separately selected ingredients of a transport code, and more realistic calculations of heavy-ion collisions. Over the years, six studies have been performed within this project. In this intermediate review, we summarize and discuss the present status of the project. We also provide condensed descriptions of the 26 participating codes, which contributed to some part of the project. These include the major codes in use today. After a compact description of the underlying transport approaches, we review the main results of the studies completed so far. They show, that in box calculations the differences between the codes can be well understood and a convergence of the results can be reached. These studies also highlight the systematic differences between the two families of transport codes, known under the names of Boltzmann–Uehling–Uhlenbeck (BUU) and Quantum Molecular Dynamics (QMD) type codes. However, when the codes were compared in full heavy-ion collisions using different physical models, as recently for pion production, they still yielded substantially different results. This calls for further comparisons of heavy-ion collisions with controlled models and of box comparisons of important ingredients, like momentum-dependent fields, which are currently underway. Our evaluation studies often indicate improved strategies in performing transport simulations and thus can provide guidance to code developers. Results of transport simulations of heavy-ion collisions from a given code will have more significance if the code can be validated against benchmark calculations such as the ones summarized in this review.
KW - Heavy-ion collisions
KW - Intermediate energy
KW - Nuclear equation-of-state
KW - Transport codes
KW - Transport theory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129978927&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85129978927&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ppnp.2022.103962
DO - 10.1016/j.ppnp.2022.103962
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85129978927
SN - 0146-6410
VL - 125
JO - Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics
JF - Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics
M1 - 103962
ER -