The difference in size and style of anthropology education in Japan and in the United States of America

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Based on my own experience as both a student and a teacher, this paper illuminates the “gap” between the systems of anthropology education in Japanese and American universities, and argues that the major “gap” between the Japanese and the American systems of anthropology education lies in the number of professional anthropologists in the unit of teaching and that small Japanese programs with just a handful of anthropologists can offer only general apprenticeship-type training while large American departments with at least fifteen or more anthropologists can provide a wide range of courses and advisory committees of specialists matching the areas of concentration chosen by graduate students. I conclude that this “gap” in the size and style of anthropology education explains why more “star” anthropologists are produced in America than in Japan.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)172-180
    Number of pages9
    JournalAsian Anthropology
    Volume16
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2017 Jul 3

    Keywords

    • anthropology education in Japan and the US
    • community of practice
    • departmental organization

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Anthropology

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The difference in size and style of anthropology education in Japan and in the United States of America'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this