Testing for Lexical Competition During Reading: Fast Priming With Orthographic Neighbors

Mariko Nakayama, Christopher R. Sears, Stephen J. Lupker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent studies have found that masked word primes that are orthographic neighbors of the target inhibit lexical decision latencies (Davis & Lupker, 2006; Nakayama, Sears, & Lupker, 2008), consistent with the predictions of lexical competition models of visual word identification (e.g., Grainger & Jacobs, 1996). In contrast, using the fast priming paradigm (Sereno & Rayner, 1992), orthographically similar primes produced facilitation in a reading task (H. Lee, Rayner, & Pollatsek, 1999; Y. Lee, Binder, Kim, Pollatsek, & Rayner, 1999). Experiment 1 replicated this facilitation effect using orthographic neighbor primes. In Experiment 2, neighbor primes and targets were presented in different cases (e.g., SIDE-tide); in this situation, the facilitation effect disappeared. However, nonword neighbor primes (e.g., KIDE-tide) still significantly facilitated reading of targets (Experiment 3). Taken together, these results suggest that it is possible to explain the priming effects from word neighbor primes in fast priming experiments in terms of the interactions between the inhibitory and facilitory processes embodied in lexical competition models.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)477-492
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Apr 1
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • fast priming
  • masked priming
  • neighbor priming
  • neighborhood frequency
  • orthographic neighbors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Testing for Lexical Competition During Reading: Fast Priming With Orthographic Neighbors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this