Surgical and Patient Reported Outcomes of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation: A Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study

Yasuhiro Kaiho, Hitoshi Masuda, Mineo Takei, Takahiro Hirayama, Takahiko Mitsui, Minato Yokoyama, Takeya Kitta, Naoki Kawamorita, Haruo Nakagawa, Masatsugu Iwamura, Yoichi Arai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose We performed a multicenter, prospective, observational study to assess outcomes, including changes in continence status and quality of life, after artificial urinary sphincter implantation. Materials and Methods Prospectively enrolled in this study were 135 patients who underwent primary AMS 800™ implantation between 2011 and 2014 at 1 of 5 institutions. Perioperative complications were categorized according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. We estimated the revision-free rate, that is the incidence of patients who did not undergo artificial urinary sphincter revision surgery. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify patient risk factors for revision surgery. The number of pads needed per day, ICIQ-SF (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form) and KHQ (King's Health Questionnaire) were used to estimate continence status and quality of life preoperatively, and 1, 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Results The artificial urinary sphincter was implanted without major complications. The revision-free rate 1, 2 and 3 years after implantation was 94%, 88% and 81%, respectively. Diabetes mellitus and poor preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists® physical status were significant risk factors for revision surgery. Continence status and quality of life were markedly improved after surgery. However, ICIQ-SF and some KHQ items showed slight but significant deterioration at 12 months compared with scores 1 month after surgery. Conclusions Artificial urinary sphincter implantation is a safe and durable procedure that substantially improves patient continence status and quality of life soon after surgery. Our results indicate that patients start to experience slight but noticeable deterioration in continence status and quality of life relatively early (within 1 year) after surgery. This finding might be helpful with appropriately counseling patients who undergo artificial urinary sphincter implantation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)245-250
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume199
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Jan

Keywords

  • artificial
  • patient reported outcome measures
  • quality of life
  • urinary bladder
  • urinary incontinence
  • urinary sphincter

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Surgical and Patient Reported Outcomes of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation: A Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this