Suppressive effects of diltiazem and verapamil on delayed rectifier K+-channel currents in murine thymocytes

Asuka Baba, Masahiro Tachi, Yoshio Maruyama, Itsuro Kazama

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Lymphocytes predominantly express delayed rectifier K+-channels (Kv1.3) in their plasma membranes, and these channels play crucial roles in the lymphocyte activation and proliferation. Since diltiazem and verapamil, which are highly lipophilic Ca2+ channel blockers (CCBs), exert relatively stronger immunomodulatory effects than the other types of CCBs, they would affect the Kv1.3-channel currents in lymphocytes. Methods Employing the standard patch-clamp whole-cell recording technique in murine thymocytes, we examined the effects of these drugs on the channel currents and the membrane capacitance. Results Both diltiazem and verapamil significantly suppressed the peak and the pulse-end currents of the channels, although the effects of verapamil were more marked than those of diltiazem. Both drugs significantly lowered the membrane capacitance, indicating the interactions between the drugs and the plasma membranes. Conclusions This study demonstrated for the first time that CCBs, such as diltiazem and verapamil, exert inhibitory effects on Kv1.3-channels expressed in lymphocytes. The effects of these drugs may be associated with the mechanisms of immunomodulation by which they decrease the production of inflammatory cytokines.

Original languageEnglish
Article number274
Pages (from-to)959-964
Number of pages6
JournalPharmacological Reports
Volume67
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Oct 1

Keywords

  • Diltiazem
  • Immunosuppressive effects
  • Kv1.3-channel
  • Membrane capacitance
  • Verapamil

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Suppressive effects of diltiazem and verapamil on delayed rectifier K<sup>+</sup>-channel currents in murine thymocytes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this