Revision of the criteria for interpreting chest X-ray findings in mass screening for lung cancer (1): Categories D and E

Motoyasu Sagawa, Tomio Nakayama, Tomotaka Sobue, Kenji Eguchi, Chiaki Endo, Kenji Nishii, Takashi Kondo

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

It had been pointed out that the criteria for interpreting chest X-ray findings in lung cancer screening had some problems. The most important problem was that Categories D and E were used in different concepts according to region. In some areas, Category E was selected when the chest X-ray findings were suspicious for lung cancer, even slightly. However, in other areas, Category E was selected only when the chest X-ray findings were strongly suspicious for lung cancer, while Category D was selected when there was some doubt. This discrepancy was not appropriate, and the concepts should be unified. Recently, a revised version of the criteria was published on the website of The Japan Lung Cancer Society. In this article, we describe the background and aim of the revised criteria, particularly Categories D and E. In addition, we emphasize that only Category E should be selected when the chest X-ray findings are suspicious for lung cancer, even slightly.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)309-313
Number of pages5
JournalJapanese Journal of Lung Cancer
Volume53
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Keywords

  • Criterion for interpretation
  • Lung cancer screening
  • Quality assurance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Revision of the criteria for interpreting chest X-ray findings in mass screening for lung cancer (1): Categories D and E'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this