Reliability and validity of the workplace social distance scale

Hatsumi Yoshii, Nozomu Mandai, Hidemitsu Saito, Kouhei Akazawa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Self-stigma, defined by a negative attitude toward oneself combined with the consciousness of being a target of prejudice, is a critical problem for psychiatric patients. Self-stigma studies among psychiatric patients have indicated that high stigma is predictive of detrimental effects such as the delay of treatment and decreases in social participation in patients, and levels of self-stigma should be statistically evaluated. In this study, we developed the Workplace Social Distance Scale (WSDS), rephrasing the eight items of the Japanese version of the Social Distance Scale (SDSJ) to apply to the work setting in Japan. We examined the reliability and validity of the WSDS among 83 psychiatric patients. Factor analysis extracted three factors from the scale items: "work relations," "shallow relationships," and "employment." These factors are similar to the assessment factors of the SDSJ. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the WSDS was 0.753. The split-half reliability for the WSDS was 0.801, indicating significant correlations. In addition, the WSDS was significantly correlated with the SDSJ. These findings suggest that the WSDS represents an approximation of self-stigma in the workplace among psychiatric patients. Our study assessed the reliability and validity of the WSDS for measuring self-stigma in Japan. Future studies should investigate the reliability and validity of the scale in other countries.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)46-51
Number of pages6
JournalGlobal journal of health science
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 May 1

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reliability and validity of the workplace social distance scale'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this