Reference values for self-recorded blood pressure: A meta-analysis of summary data

Lutgarde Thijs, Jan A. Staessen, Hilde Celis, Régis De Gaudemaris, Yutsuka Imai, Stevo Julius, Robert Fagard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

119 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The widespread clinical use of self-recorded blood pressure measurement is limited by the lack of generally accepted reference values. The purpose of this study was therefore to perform a meta-analysis of summary data in an attempt to determine an operational threshold for self-recorded blood pressures. Studies and Methods: Seventeen studies, including a total of 5422 subjects, were reviewed. Eight of these 17 studies included both normotensive and untreated hypertensive subjects, while the other 9 reports included normotensive subjects only. Within each study an operational cutoff point between normotension and hypertension was derived by means of the mean+2 SDs and the 95th percentiles of the self-recorded blood pressure in normotensive subjects. These 2 methods were contrasted with 2 other techniques that have been applied in the literature to calculate (1) the self-recorded pressures equivalent to a conventional pressure of 140 mm Hg systolic and 90 mm Hg diastolic by means of regression analysis and (2) the self-recorded blood pressures at the percentiles corresponding to a conventional pressure of 140/90 mm Hg. The latter 2 methods were applied in untreated subjects not selected on the basis of their blood pressure. Results: With weighting for the number of subjects included in the various studies, the self-recorded blood pressure averaged 115/71 mm Hg in normotensive persons and 119/74 mm Hg in untreated subjects not selected on the basis of their blood pressure. The reference values for self-recorded blood pressures determined by the mean+2 SDs (137/89 mm Hg) or the 95th percentile (135/86 mm Hg) of the distribution in normotensive subjects were concordant within 2/3 mm Hg, whereas the cutoff points derived with the regression and percentile methods were considerably lower, ie, 125/79 and 129/84 mm Hg, respectively. Conclusions: Until the relationship between self-recorded pressure and the incidence of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality is further clarified by prospective studies, a mean self-recorded blood pressure above 135 mm Hg systolic or 85 mm Hg diastolic may be considered hypertensive.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)481-488
Number of pages8
JournalArchives of Internal Medicine
Volume158
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1998 Mar 9

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reference values for self-recorded blood pressure: A meta-analysis of summary data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this