Abstract
The efficiency of upfront consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy/autologous stem-cell transplantation (HDCT/ASCT) for newly diagnosed high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) may be influenced by induction chemotherapy. To select better induction chemotherapy regimens for HDCT/ASCT, a randomized phase II study was conducted in high-risk DLBCL patients having an age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) score of 2 or 3. As induction chemotherapy, 6 cycles of R-CHOP-14 (arm A) or 3 cycles of R-CHOP-14 followed by 3 cycles of CHASER (arm B) were planned, and patients who responded proceeded to HDCT with LEED and ASCT. The primary endpoint was 2-y progression-free survival (PFS), and the main secondary endpoints included overall survival, overall response rate, and adverse events (AEs). In total, 71 patients were enrolled. With a median follow-up of 40.3 mo, 2-y PFS in arms A and B were 68.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50.5%-81.2%) and 66.7% (95% CI: 48.8%-79.5%), respectively. Overall survival at 2 y in arms A and B was 74.3% (95% CI: 56.4%-85.7%) and 83.3% (95% CI: 66.6%-92.1%). Overall response rates were 82.9% in arm A and 69.4% in arm B. During induction chemotherapy, 45.7% and 75.0% of patients in arms A and B, respectively, had grade ≥ 3 non-hematologic toxicities. One patient in arm A and 6 in arm B discontinued induction chemotherapy due to AEs. In conclusion, R-CHOP-14 showed higher 2-y PFS and less toxicity compared with R-CHOP-14/CHASER in patients with high-risk DLBCL, suggesting the former to be a more promising induction regimen for further investigations (UMIN-CTR, UMIN000003823).
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 3770-3779 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Cancer science |
Volume | 111 |
Issue number | 10 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2020 Oct 1 |
Keywords
- JCOG-LSG
- autologous stem-cell transplantation
- diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
- high-dose chemotherapy
- induction chemotherapy
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Oncology
- Cancer Research
Access to Document
Other files and links
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'R-CHOP-14 versus R-CHOP-14/CHASER for upfront autologous transplantation in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: JCOG0908 study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS
R-CHOP-14 versus R-CHOP-14/CHASER for upfront autologous transplantation in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma : JCOG0908 study. / Kagami, Yoshitoyo; Yamamoto, Kazuhito; Shibata, Taro; Tobinai, Kensei; Imaizumi, Yoshitaka; Uchida, Toshiki; Shimada, Kazuyuki; Minauchi, Koichiro; Fukuhara, Noriko; Kobayashi, Hirofumi; Yamauchi, Nobuhiko; Tsujimura, Hideki; Hangaishi, Akira; Tominaga, Ryo; Suehiro, Youko; Yoshida, Shinichiro; Inoue, Yoshiko; Suzuki, Sachiko; Tokuhira, Michihide; Kusumoto, Shigeru; Kuroda, Junya; Yakushijin, Yoshihiro; Takamatsu, Yasushi; Kubota, Yasushi; Nosaka, Kisato; Morishima, Satoko; Nakamura, Shigeo; Ogura, Michinori; Maruyama, Dai; Hotta, Tomomitsu; Morishima, Yasuo; Tsukasaki, Kunihiro; Nagai, Hirokazu.
In: Cancer science, Vol. 111, No. 10, 01.10.2020, p. 3770-3779.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - R-CHOP-14 versus R-CHOP-14/CHASER for upfront autologous transplantation in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
T2 - JCOG0908 study
AU - Kagami, Yoshitoyo
AU - Yamamoto, Kazuhito
AU - Shibata, Taro
AU - Tobinai, Kensei
AU - Imaizumi, Yoshitaka
AU - Uchida, Toshiki
AU - Shimada, Kazuyuki
AU - Minauchi, Koichiro
AU - Fukuhara, Noriko
AU - Kobayashi, Hirofumi
AU - Yamauchi, Nobuhiko
AU - Tsujimura, Hideki
AU - Hangaishi, Akira
AU - Tominaga, Ryo
AU - Suehiro, Youko
AU - Yoshida, Shinichiro
AU - Inoue, Yoshiko
AU - Suzuki, Sachiko
AU - Tokuhira, Michihide
AU - Kusumoto, Shigeru
AU - Kuroda, Junya
AU - Yakushijin, Yoshihiro
AU - Takamatsu, Yasushi
AU - Kubota, Yasushi
AU - Nosaka, Kisato
AU - Morishima, Satoko
AU - Nakamura, Shigeo
AU - Ogura, Michinori
AU - Maruyama, Dai
AU - Hotta, Tomomitsu
AU - Morishima, Yasuo
AU - Tsukasaki, Kunihiro
AU - Nagai, Hirokazu
N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported in part by the National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund (grant numbers 23-A-16, 23-A-17, 26-A-4, 29-A-39); and by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare Grants-in-Aid for Cancer Research (grant numbers 16-6, 20S-1, 20S-6, 23-A-16, 23-A-17), and Health and Labor Sciences Research Grants for Clinical Cancer Research (grant numbers 19-27 and 22-29). The authors are grateful to pathologists (Dr. Yoshihiro Matsuno, Dr. Kengo Takeuchi) for their support in the Central Pathological Review and the members of the JCOG Data Center and JCOG Operations Office (Dr. Tomonori Mizutani, Dr. Tomoko Kataoka, Mr. Gakuto Ogawa Dr. Tomohiro Kadota, Dr. Yuya Sato, Mr. Junki Mizusawa, and Dr. Kenichi Miyamoto), data management (Ms Yuko Watanabe), and oversight of the study management (Dr. Haruhiko Fukuda). Funding Information: This work was supported in part by the National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund (grant numbers 23‐A‐16, 23‐A‐17, 26‐A‐4, 29‐A‐39); and by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare Grants‐in‐Aid for Cancer Research (grant numbers 16‐6, 20S‐1, 20S‐6, 23‐A‐16, 23‐A‐17), and Health and Labor Sciences Research Grants for Clinical Cancer Research (grant numbers 19‐27 and 22‐29). Funding Information: Yoshitoyo Kagami has nothing to disclose; Kazuhito Yamamoto reports grants from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, grants from the National Cancer Center, during the conduct of the study; grants from AbbVie, grants from AstraZeneca, grants from Bayer, grants from Celgene, grants and personal fees from Chugai, grants and personal fees from Eisai, grants from Incyte/IQVIA, grants and personal fees from Mundipharma, grants from Nippon Shinyaku, grants from Novartis, grants from Solasia Pharma, grants from SymBio, grants from Yakult, grants from Zenyaku, personal fees from HUYA/IQVIA, personal fees from Takeda; Taro Shibata has nothing to disclose; Kensei Tobinai reports personal fees from Eisai, grants and personal fees from Takeda, personal and grants from Mundipharma, personal fees from HUYA Bioscience International, personal and grants from Kyowa Kirin, personal and grants from Celgene, personal and grants from Chugai, personal and grants from Ono, personal fees from Yakult, personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo, personal fees from Bristol‐Myers Squibb, personal fees from Meiji Seika Kaisha, personal fees from Solasia, personal fees from Verastem, personal fees from Zenyaku Kogyo, grants from Janssen, grants from Eisai, grants from Takeda, grants from AbbVie, outside the submitted work; Yoshitaka Imaizumi has nothing to disclose; Toshiki Uchida reports personal fees from Pfizer outside the submitted work; Kazuyuki Shimada reports grants from Celgene, grants from Otsuka, grants from MSD, grants from Kyowa Kirin outside the submitted work; Koichiro Minauchi has nothing to disclose; Noriko Fukuhara reports personal fees and grants from Chugai, personal fees from Kyowa Kirin, grants from Eisai, grants from Ono, grants from AbbVie, grants from Bayer, grants from Soleisia, grants from Gilead sciences, grants from Incyte corporation outside the submitted work; Hirofumi Kobayashi has nothing to disclose; Nobuhiko Yamauchi reports personal fees from Takeda, grants from Amgen, grants from Daiichi Sankyo, grants from Celgene outside the submitted work; Hideki Tsujimura has nothing to disclose; Akira Hangaishi has nothing to disclose; Ryo Tominaga has nothing to disclose; Youko Suehiro reports grants from Chugai, grants from Novartis, grants from Bayer, grants from Eisai, grants from Ono, grants from Otsuka, grants from Pfizer, grants from Amgen, grants from Daiichi Sankyo, grants from Biopharma, grants from Solasia, grants from Celgene, grants from Takeda, outside the submitted work; Shinichiro Yoshida has nothing to disclose; Yoshiko Inoue has nothing to disclose; Sachiko Suzuki has nothing to disclose; Michihide Tokuhira has nothing to disclose; Shigeru Kusumoto reports grants and personal fees from Chugai; Junya Kuroda reports grants from Kyowa Kirin, grants from Chugai, outside the submitted work; Yoshihiro Yakushijin has nothing to disclose; Yasushi Takamatsu reports personal fee and annual scholarship endowment from Celgene, personal fee and annual scholarship endowment from Takeda, personal fee and annual scholarship endowment from Ono, personal fees from Janssen, annual scholarship endowment from Chugai, annual scholarship endowment from TAIHO, annual scholarship endowment from Astellas, annual scholarship endowment from Kyowa Hakko Kirin, endowed chair or accepted a researcher from Takeda, Ono, Beckman Coulter, outside the submitted work; Yasushi Kubota has nothing to disclose; Kisato Nosaka reports personal fees from Celgene outside the submitted work; Satoko Morishima has nothing to disclose; Shigeo Nakamura has nothing to disclose; Michinori Ogura reports personal fees from Meiji Seika outside the submitted work; Dai Maruyama reports personal fees and grants from Takeda, personal fees and grants from Celgene, personal fees and grants from Mundipharma, personal fees from Eisai, personal fees and grants from Janssen, personal fees from Chugai, personal fees from Kyowa Kirin, grants from Ono, grants from MSD, grants from Novartis, outside the submitted work; Tomomitsu Hotta scientific advisor from SymBio, outside the submitted work; Yasuo Morishima has nothing to disclose; Kunihiro Tsukasaki reports annual scholarship endowment from Chugai, outside the submitted work; Hirokazu Nagai reports grants from Bayer, grants from AstlaZeneca, grants from Zenyaku, personal fees and grants from Takeda, grants from Mundipharma, grants from SymBio, personal fees and grants from Celgene, personal fees, grants and annual scholarship endowment from, personal fees from Eisai, outside the submitted work. Publisher Copyright: © 2020 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.
PY - 2020/10/1
Y1 - 2020/10/1
N2 - The efficiency of upfront consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy/autologous stem-cell transplantation (HDCT/ASCT) for newly diagnosed high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) may be influenced by induction chemotherapy. To select better induction chemotherapy regimens for HDCT/ASCT, a randomized phase II study was conducted in high-risk DLBCL patients having an age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) score of 2 or 3. As induction chemotherapy, 6 cycles of R-CHOP-14 (arm A) or 3 cycles of R-CHOP-14 followed by 3 cycles of CHASER (arm B) were planned, and patients who responded proceeded to HDCT with LEED and ASCT. The primary endpoint was 2-y progression-free survival (PFS), and the main secondary endpoints included overall survival, overall response rate, and adverse events (AEs). In total, 71 patients were enrolled. With a median follow-up of 40.3 mo, 2-y PFS in arms A and B were 68.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50.5%-81.2%) and 66.7% (95% CI: 48.8%-79.5%), respectively. Overall survival at 2 y in arms A and B was 74.3% (95% CI: 56.4%-85.7%) and 83.3% (95% CI: 66.6%-92.1%). Overall response rates were 82.9% in arm A and 69.4% in arm B. During induction chemotherapy, 45.7% and 75.0% of patients in arms A and B, respectively, had grade ≥ 3 non-hematologic toxicities. One patient in arm A and 6 in arm B discontinued induction chemotherapy due to AEs. In conclusion, R-CHOP-14 showed higher 2-y PFS and less toxicity compared with R-CHOP-14/CHASER in patients with high-risk DLBCL, suggesting the former to be a more promising induction regimen for further investigations (UMIN-CTR, UMIN000003823).
AB - The efficiency of upfront consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy/autologous stem-cell transplantation (HDCT/ASCT) for newly diagnosed high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) may be influenced by induction chemotherapy. To select better induction chemotherapy regimens for HDCT/ASCT, a randomized phase II study was conducted in high-risk DLBCL patients having an age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) score of 2 or 3. As induction chemotherapy, 6 cycles of R-CHOP-14 (arm A) or 3 cycles of R-CHOP-14 followed by 3 cycles of CHASER (arm B) were planned, and patients who responded proceeded to HDCT with LEED and ASCT. The primary endpoint was 2-y progression-free survival (PFS), and the main secondary endpoints included overall survival, overall response rate, and adverse events (AEs). In total, 71 patients were enrolled. With a median follow-up of 40.3 mo, 2-y PFS in arms A and B were 68.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50.5%-81.2%) and 66.7% (95% CI: 48.8%-79.5%), respectively. Overall survival at 2 y in arms A and B was 74.3% (95% CI: 56.4%-85.7%) and 83.3% (95% CI: 66.6%-92.1%). Overall response rates were 82.9% in arm A and 69.4% in arm B. During induction chemotherapy, 45.7% and 75.0% of patients in arms A and B, respectively, had grade ≥ 3 non-hematologic toxicities. One patient in arm A and 6 in arm B discontinued induction chemotherapy due to AEs. In conclusion, R-CHOP-14 showed higher 2-y PFS and less toxicity compared with R-CHOP-14/CHASER in patients with high-risk DLBCL, suggesting the former to be a more promising induction regimen for further investigations (UMIN-CTR, UMIN000003823).
KW - JCOG-LSG
KW - autologous stem-cell transplantation
KW - diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
KW - high-dose chemotherapy
KW - induction chemotherapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090588417&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85090588417&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/cas.14604
DO - 10.1111/cas.14604
M3 - Article
C2 - 32767806
AN - SCOPUS:85090588417
VL - 111
SP - 3770
EP - 3779
JO - Cancer Science
JF - Cancer Science
SN - 1347-9032
IS - 10
ER -