TY - JOUR
T1 - Quality assessment and assurance in Japanese universities
T2 - The plight of the social sciences
AU - Yonezawa, Akiyoshi
PY - 2008/6/1
Y1 - 2008/6/1
N2 - Japanese universities are currently experiencing rapid development in quality assessment and assurance activities. In 2004, the national government introduced corporate-style governance into national universities, accompanied by a new evaluation scheme to be carried out by both a governmental committee and a national agency called the National Institution for Academic Degrees and University Evaluation. Most local public universities operated by prefectures and cities have also adopted corporate-style governance and face pressure from local assemblies to engage in formal performance assessment. Furthermore, since 2004 the Japanese government has required seven-year, cyclical 'certified evaluations' (accreditation) for all national, local public and private universities and colleges. This certified evaluation is implemented at the institutional level and applies to new and evolving forms of professional post-graduate education programmes. Project-based funding schemes, such as 'Centres of Excellence (COEs)' in research and 'Good Practices' in various other education programmes are regarded as indirect forms of performance assessment. Despite the implementation of these initiatives, however, the means by which the quality of university education and research is best assessed remains the subject of hot debate, especially within the humanities and social sciences. This article considers the latest initiatives in quality assessment and assurance of education and research activities in Japan, focusing on policy and administrative reform and the particular challenges faced by the social sciences.
AB - Japanese universities are currently experiencing rapid development in quality assessment and assurance activities. In 2004, the national government introduced corporate-style governance into national universities, accompanied by a new evaluation scheme to be carried out by both a governmental committee and a national agency called the National Institution for Academic Degrees and University Evaluation. Most local public universities operated by prefectures and cities have also adopted corporate-style governance and face pressure from local assemblies to engage in formal performance assessment. Furthermore, since 2004 the Japanese government has required seven-year, cyclical 'certified evaluations' (accreditation) for all national, local public and private universities and colleges. This certified evaluation is implemented at the institutional level and applies to new and evolving forms of professional post-graduate education programmes. Project-based funding schemes, such as 'Centres of Excellence (COEs)' in research and 'Good Practices' in various other education programmes are regarded as indirect forms of performance assessment. Despite the implementation of these initiatives, however, the means by which the quality of university education and research is best assessed remains the subject of hot debate, especially within the humanities and social sciences. This article considers the latest initiatives in quality assessment and assurance of education and research activities in Japan, focusing on policy and administrative reform and the particular challenges faced by the social sciences.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=45949102189&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=45949102189&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ssjj/jyn021
DO - 10.1093/ssjj/jyn021
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:45949102189
VL - 11
SP - 69
EP - 82
JO - Social Science Japan Journal
JF - Social Science Japan Journal
SN - 1369-1465
IS - 1
ER -