Abstract
We evaluate the directional accuracy of Institute for Supply Management (ISM) indices in predicting the direction of the US economy direction; to do so, we make use of a method developed by Pesaran and Timmermann (2009). By illustrating an application of the new market-timing test and extending it to a joint evaluation of increase/decrease and acceleration/deceleration, we show that while the ISM indices are useful predictors of industrial production and employment with regard to monthly economic activity and to business cycle expansion/recession, they are not useful predictors of real gross domestic product or hours worked. Our findings suggest that the ISM indices broadly provide early qualitative information on the US economy. Our findings also suggest that the importance of the nonmanufacturing sector becomes clear when examining business cycles in the U.S.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 599-618 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | International Review of Economics and Finance |
Volume | 29 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2014 Jan |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Directional analysis
- Institute for Supply Management
- Nonmanufacturing index
- Purchasing Managers' Index
- Survey data
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Finance
- Economics and Econometrics