TY - JOUR
T1 - Provision of individualized care and built environment of nursing homes in Japan
AU - Sawamura, Kanae
AU - Nakashima, Taeko
AU - Nakanishi, Miharu
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by a grant from the Health and Welfare Bureau for the Elderly , the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan . The ministry had no involvement in the study design, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; and in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
PY - 2013/5
Y1 - 2013/5
N2 - The Japanese government introduced the concept of 'unit-care model' (a large-scale facility which consists of small-scale groups) in 2003 into nursing homes. The governmental requirements are mainly about structure and staffing, not about the way of care provision. We aimed to examine if the requirements affect actual care provision. We sent a questionnaire to 300 unit-care model nursing homes and 900 conventional model nursing homes. 81 unit-care model facilities, 164 conventional care model facilities, and 103 conventional care facilities which created small groupings of people within larger buildings as an alternative to multiple small separate units (group-care model) were included in the analysis. We asked the administrator of the facilities about their principles for care provision by the dimensions of (1) wake-up, (2) dressing assistance in the morning, (3) meal, (4) bathing, (5) toileting assistance, and (6) spare time. We mainly asked about flexibility of scheduling and choice for menu, programs, and utensils. Unit-care model facilities and group-care model facilities were negatively associated with principles of fixed time and all-at-once assistance for waking up, dressing, and toileting. Residents had more choice for menu and programs for spare time in unit-care model facilities and group-care model facilities. The governmental requirements affected principles for care provision by defining the structure of facilities and staffing for desirable care provision. Raising fees for the group-care model can be an effective measure to achieve it in facilities with conventional structure.
AB - The Japanese government introduced the concept of 'unit-care model' (a large-scale facility which consists of small-scale groups) in 2003 into nursing homes. The governmental requirements are mainly about structure and staffing, not about the way of care provision. We aimed to examine if the requirements affect actual care provision. We sent a questionnaire to 300 unit-care model nursing homes and 900 conventional model nursing homes. 81 unit-care model facilities, 164 conventional care model facilities, and 103 conventional care facilities which created small groupings of people within larger buildings as an alternative to multiple small separate units (group-care model) were included in the analysis. We asked the administrator of the facilities about their principles for care provision by the dimensions of (1) wake-up, (2) dressing assistance in the morning, (3) meal, (4) bathing, (5) toileting assistance, and (6) spare time. We mainly asked about flexibility of scheduling and choice for menu, programs, and utensils. Unit-care model facilities and group-care model facilities were negatively associated with principles of fixed time and all-at-once assistance for waking up, dressing, and toileting. Residents had more choice for menu and programs for spare time in unit-care model facilities and group-care model facilities. The governmental requirements affected principles for care provision by defining the structure of facilities and staffing for desirable care provision. Raising fees for the group-care model can be an effective measure to achieve it in facilities with conventional structure.
KW - Frail elderly
KW - Japan
KW - Long-term care
KW - Nursing homes
KW - Small-scale living facilities
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873431816&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873431816&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.archger.2012.11.009
DO - 10.1016/j.archger.2012.11.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 23260333
AN - SCOPUS:84873431816
SN - 0167-4943
VL - 56
SP - 416
EP - 424
JO - Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
JF - Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
IS - 3
ER -