TY - JOUR
T1 - PE3-017 T-Wave Oversensing Related Inappropriate ICD Shocks Avoided with Automatic Algorithm
T2 - Bench Simulation of 3 Cases
AU - Okamura, Hideo
AU - Kurita, Takashi
AU - Yamada, Yuko
AU - Noda, Takashi
AU - Satomi, Kazuhiro
AU - Aiba, Takeshi
AU - Shimizu, Wataru
AU - Aihara, Naohiko
AU - Cao, Jian
AU - Gillberg, Jeffery M.
AU - Saito-Benz, Hideshiro
AU - Kamakura, Shiro
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - Introduction: Inappropriate shock due to T-wave oversensing (TWOS) is an unsolved issue in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy. New algorithm launched by Medtronic utilizes electrogram (EGM) sense-pattern and morphology to distinguish TWOS from ventricular arrhythmias. We have evaluated this algorithm using human data. Methods: Stored EGMs of TWOS from 3 Japanese patients were fed into ICD bench system equipped with the new algorithm. We used original detection parameters to reproduce TWOS from recorded episodes. Then we re-analyzed the same episode using the new algorithm to test whether it could properly reject the TWOS and avoid shocks. Results: Case1: Brugada patient who recieved inappropriate shock due to TWOS in VF zone. Amplitude of R-wave and T-wave was 2mV and 3mV, respectively. Successful TWOS rejection was observed. Case2: Idiopathic VF patient who experienced inappropriate shock in VF zone. R-wave was variable (1.5-7.5mV) and T-wave was 2mV. Appropriate TWOS rejection was achieved. Case3: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patient who recieved 11 shocks due to TWOS in VT zone. R-wave was 14mV and T wave was 4mV. The algorithm rejected this episode properly. Conclusion: The new algorithm rejected TWOS and avoided the inappropriate shocks successfully in all these cases in the bench test.
AB - Introduction: Inappropriate shock due to T-wave oversensing (TWOS) is an unsolved issue in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy. New algorithm launched by Medtronic utilizes electrogram (EGM) sense-pattern and morphology to distinguish TWOS from ventricular arrhythmias. We have evaluated this algorithm using human data. Methods: Stored EGMs of TWOS from 3 Japanese patients were fed into ICD bench system equipped with the new algorithm. We used original detection parameters to reproduce TWOS from recorded episodes. Then we re-analyzed the same episode using the new algorithm to test whether it could properly reject the TWOS and avoid shocks. Results: Case1: Brugada patient who recieved inappropriate shock due to TWOS in VF zone. Amplitude of R-wave and T-wave was 2mV and 3mV, respectively. Successful TWOS rejection was observed. Case2: Idiopathic VF patient who experienced inappropriate shock in VF zone. R-wave was variable (1.5-7.5mV) and T-wave was 2mV. Appropriate TWOS rejection was achieved. Case3: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patient who recieved 11 shocks due to TWOS in VT zone. R-wave was 14mV and T wave was 4mV. The algorithm rejected this episode properly. Conclusion: The new algorithm rejected TWOS and avoided the inappropriate shocks successfully in all these cases in the bench test.
KW - algorithm
KW - ICD
KW - T wave oversensing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008723222&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85008723222&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4020/jhrs.27.PE3_017
DO - 10.4020/jhrs.27.PE3_017
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85008723222
SN - 1880-4276
VL - 27
SP - 378
JO - Journal of Arrhythmia
JF - Journal of Arrhythmia
ER -