Résultats de l'intervention de Bankart chez les sportifs de contact versus non contact

Translated title of the contribution: Outcome of Bankart repair in contact versus non-contact athletes

N. Yamamoto, H. Kijima, H. Nagamoto, D. Kurokawa, H. Takahashi, H. Sano, E. Itoi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: The clinical results of arthroscopic Bankart repair for contact athletes varies according to published reports. The purposes of this study were to analyze the clinical outcome of open or arthroscopic Bankart repair and to investigate the results in contact and non-contact athletes. Hypothesis: Clinical outcome of arthroscopic Bankart repair is similar to that of open procedure. Patients and methods: One hundred patients with recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation without a large bony defect were retrospectively reviewed. Fifty-one contact and 49non-contact athletes were found with a mean follow-up of 17months. Forty-nine shoulders underwent arthroscopic Bankart repairs; 51shoulders had open Bankart repairs. Results: In non-contact athletes, there was a 5% (1/22cases) recurrence rate in the open group and 4% (1/27cases) in the arthroscopic group. In contrast, in contact athletes, there was a 10% (3/29cases) recurrence rate in the open group and 14% (3/22cases) in the arthroscopic group. There was no significant difference in the recurrence rate between contact and non-contact athletes, although contact athletes showed two to three times a higher recurrence rate than that of non-contact athletes. The Rowe score and Constant score showed no significant difference between the two procedures and between the contact and non-contact athletes. The rate of the complete return to sports showed no significant difference between contact and non-contact athletes. Conclusion: The recurrence rate of Bankart repair in the contact athletes was 2times higher in the open group and 3times higher in the arthroscopic group than in the non-contact athletes. Clinical outcome of arthroscopic Bankart repair was similar to that of open procedure. Level of evidence: Level IV, retrospective study.

Translated title of the contributionOutcome of Bankart repair in contact versus non-contact athletes
Original languageFrench
Pages (from-to)272
Number of pages1
JournalRevue de Chirurgie Orthopedique et Traumatologique
Volume101
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jun 1

Keywords

  • Bankart repair
  • Contact athlete
  • Non-contact athlete
  • Shoulder instability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Outcome of Bankart repair in contact versus non-contact athletes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this