Optimal pacing sites for cardiac resynchronization therapy for patients with a systemic right ventricle with or without a rudimentary left ventricle

Aims This study aims to assess the impact of pacing sites on the effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in systemic right ventricle (sRV) patients with/without a rudimentary left ventricle (rLV). Methods and results We evaluated 13 procedures in 11 sRV patients with a wide QRS (>150 ms). Based on the digitalization results of ventriculography, long-axis dyssynchrony (LD) was defined as extremely delayed right ventricular (RV) outflow tract movement: ≥100 ms delay from the RV apical contraction, and short-axis dyssynchrony (SD) was defined as a paradoxical contraction between the rLV and sRV caused by a conduction delay between the two ventricles. During the follow-up period (2.1 ± 1.9 years), the response rates were 71% (5/7) and 33% (2/6) in the sRV patients with and without an rLV, respectively (P = ns). Following the CRT, the QRS duration remained similar between the responders and nonresponders. Among five responders with an rLV, the leads were placed in the longitudinal RV direction in two with LD, longitudinal RV direction with fusion of the intrinsic QRS in two with LD + SD, and laterally on opposite sides of both ventricles in one with SD. Among two responders without an rLV, the leads were placed in the longitudinal RV direction in those two with LD. Conclusions In sRV patients with LD with/without an rLV, the leads should be placed at furthest sites in the longitudinal RV direction. In patients with an rLV and SD, the leads should be placed laterally on opposite sides of both ventricles.