TY - JOUR
T1 - On kernel functions for bi-fidelity Gaussian process regressions
AU - Palar, Pramudita Satria
AU - Parussini, Lucia
AU - Bregant, Luigi
AU - Shimoyama, Koji
AU - Zuhal, Lavi Rizki
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge financial support from Penelitian Dasar Unggulan Perguruan Tinggi research scheme administered by Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi, Republic of Indonesia.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2023/2
Y1 - 2023/2
N2 - This paper investigates the impact of kernel functions on the accuracy of bi-fidelity Gaussian process regressions (GPR) for engineering applications. The potential of composite kernel learning (CKL) and model selection is also studied, aiming to ease the process of manual kernel selection. Using the autoregressive Gaussian process as the base model, this paper studies four kernel functions and their combinations: Gaussian, Matern-3/2, Matern-5/2, and Cubic. Experiments on four engineering test problems show that the best kernel is problem dependent and sometimes might be counter-intuitive, even when a large amount of low-fidelity data already aids the model. In this regard, using CKL or automatic kernel selection via cross validation and maximum likelihood can reduce the tendency to select a poor-performing kernel. In addition, the CKL technique can create a slightly more accurate model than the best-performing individual kernel. The main drawback of CKL is its significantly expensive computational cost. The results also show that, given a sufficient amount of samples, tuning the regression term is important to improve the accuracy and robustness of bi-fidelity GPR, while decreasing the importance of the proper kernel selection.
AB - This paper investigates the impact of kernel functions on the accuracy of bi-fidelity Gaussian process regressions (GPR) for engineering applications. The potential of composite kernel learning (CKL) and model selection is also studied, aiming to ease the process of manual kernel selection. Using the autoregressive Gaussian process as the base model, this paper studies four kernel functions and their combinations: Gaussian, Matern-3/2, Matern-5/2, and Cubic. Experiments on four engineering test problems show that the best kernel is problem dependent and sometimes might be counter-intuitive, even when a large amount of low-fidelity data already aids the model. In this regard, using CKL or automatic kernel selection via cross validation and maximum likelihood can reduce the tendency to select a poor-performing kernel. In addition, the CKL technique can create a slightly more accurate model than the best-performing individual kernel. The main drawback of CKL is its significantly expensive computational cost. The results also show that, given a sufficient amount of samples, tuning the regression term is important to improve the accuracy and robustness of bi-fidelity GPR, while decreasing the importance of the proper kernel selection.
KW - Bi-fidelity
KW - Engineering design
KW - Gaussian process regression
KW - Kernel function
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147729704&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85147729704&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00158-023-03487-y
DO - 10.1007/s00158-023-03487-y
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85147729704
SN - 1615-147X
VL - 66
JO - Structural Optimization
JF - Structural Optimization
IS - 2
M1 - 37
ER -