TY - JOUR
T1 - Motivation, Strategy and Challenges of Conserving Urban Biodiversity in Local Contexts
T2 - Urban Transitions Conference 2016
AU - Kohsaka, Ryo
AU - Uchiyama, Yuta
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was conducted as a part of the research project; JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP26360062 and MEXT KAKENHI Grant Number JP15H01597. Support for this project also included funds from the Obayashi Foundation, the Kurita Water and Environment Foundation and the Heiwa Nakajima Foundation. Part of the project was also conducted as a part of the research project, Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (S15−2[3]). Thanks are extended to Ms. M. Iwata for her valuable comments and cooperation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Authors.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Capturing the status, trends, and relationships in biodiversity and urbanization is a multi-dimensional challenge for scientists and policy-makers alike. An indicator, the City Biodiversity Index (CBI), was developed as a self-assessment tool to measure trends in urban contexts in three spheres: biodiversity, ecosystems, and governance. Its primary focus is "green," but it further encompasses social and economic aspects to measure the sustainability of a city. The indicators can be used to visualize trends and translate scientific assessments into policy. Since 2008, 25 cities voluntarily applied the CBI. In Asia, Japan applied certain components of the CBI to 665 municipalities in 2016 in one of the first large-scale applications at national level. Regarding data visualization methods, the city of Helsinki, for example, has a website to visualize environmental information on biodiversity. The aim of this paper is to identify the practical and scientific challenges in conservation of biodiversity in medium to small cities based on a questionnaire survey. The research site is Ishikawa prefecture, which comprises municipalities in the target sizes. The survey shows that certain terms were difficult to understand conceptually, particularly "ecosystem services." The lack of monitoring and available datasets posed a number of difficulties for applying the index to the majority of cities. A method to evaluate biodiversity and ecosystem services has not yet been established. These technical difficulties are complicated with administrative and financial issues as well as human resources, issues shared by the municipalities. Based on our survey results, recommended activities are discussed.
AB - Capturing the status, trends, and relationships in biodiversity and urbanization is a multi-dimensional challenge for scientists and policy-makers alike. An indicator, the City Biodiversity Index (CBI), was developed as a self-assessment tool to measure trends in urban contexts in three spheres: biodiversity, ecosystems, and governance. Its primary focus is "green," but it further encompasses social and economic aspects to measure the sustainability of a city. The indicators can be used to visualize trends and translate scientific assessments into policy. Since 2008, 25 cities voluntarily applied the CBI. In Asia, Japan applied certain components of the CBI to 665 municipalities in 2016 in one of the first large-scale applications at national level. Regarding data visualization methods, the city of Helsinki, for example, has a website to visualize environmental information on biodiversity. The aim of this paper is to identify the practical and scientific challenges in conservation of biodiversity in medium to small cities based on a questionnaire survey. The research site is Ishikawa prefecture, which comprises municipalities in the target sizes. The survey shows that certain terms were difficult to understand conceptually, particularly "ecosystem services." The lack of monitoring and available datasets posed a number of difficulties for applying the index to the majority of cities. A method to evaluate biodiversity and ecosystem services has not yet been established. These technical difficulties are complicated with administrative and financial issues as well as human resources, issues shared by the municipalities. Based on our survey results, recommended activities are discussed.
KW - City Biodiversity Index
KW - Urban biodiversity
KW - ecosystem service
KW - municipality
KW - participatory approach
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029832337&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029832337&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.085
DO - 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.085
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85029832337
SN - 1877-7058
VL - 198
SP - 212
EP - 218
JO - Procedia Engineering
JF - Procedia Engineering
Y2 - 1 September 2016
ER -