TY - JOUR
T1 - Living status, economic hardship and sleep disturbance were associated with subjective shoulder pain in survivors of the Great East Japan Earthquake
T2 - A cross sectional study
AU - Hagiwara, Yoshihiro
AU - Sekiguchi, Takuya
AU - Yabe, Yutaka
AU - Sugawara, Yumi
AU - Watanabe, Takashi
AU - Kanazawa, Kenji
AU - Koide, Masashi
AU - Itaya, Nobuyuki
AU - Tsuchiya, Masahiro
AU - Tsuji, Ichiro
AU - Itoi, Eiji
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by the Health Sciences Research Grant for Health Service (H24-Kenki-Shitei-002 (Fukko)), Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan and a grant from the Japanese Society for Musculoskeletal Medicine (H24).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association
PY - 2017/5/1
Y1 - 2017/5/1
N2 - Background The Great East Japan Earthquake and devastating Tsunami hit hard everything on the northeastern coast of Japan. This study aimed to determine socio-psychological factors for “subjective shoulder pain” of the survivors at 2 years evaluated by a self-report questionnaire. Methods Between November 2012 to February 2013, survivors replied to the self-report questionnaire, and 2275 people consented to join this study. Living status was divided into 5 categories (1. same house as before the earthquake (reference group), 2. temporary small house, 3. apartment, 4. house of relatives or acquaintance, 5. new house) and economic hardship was divided into 4 categories (1. normal (reference group), 2. a little bit hard, 3. hard, 4. very hard). Gender, age, body mass index, living areas, smoking and drinking habits, complications of diabetes mellitus and cerebral stroke, working status, and walking time were considered as the confounding factors. Kessler Psychological Distress Scale of ≥10/24 and Athens Insomnia Scale of ≥6/24 points were defined as a presence of psychological distress and sleep disturbance, respectively. We used multiple logistic regression analysis to examine the association of shoulder pain with living environment, economic hardship, psychological distress, and sleep disturbance at 2 years after the earthquake. Results There were significant differences in the risk of having shoulder pain in those with “apartment” (OR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.03–2.96), “house of relatives or acquaintance” (OR = 2.98, 95% CI = 1.42–6.25), economic hardship of “hard” (OR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.08–2.7) and “very hard” (OR = 2.51, 95% CI = 1.47–4.29), and sleep disturbance (OR = 2.96, 95% CI = 2.05–4.27). Conclusions Living status of “apartment” and “house of relatives or acquaintance”, economic hardship of “hard” and “very hard”, and “sleep disturbance” were significantly associated with shoulder pain.
AB - Background The Great East Japan Earthquake and devastating Tsunami hit hard everything on the northeastern coast of Japan. This study aimed to determine socio-psychological factors for “subjective shoulder pain” of the survivors at 2 years evaluated by a self-report questionnaire. Methods Between November 2012 to February 2013, survivors replied to the self-report questionnaire, and 2275 people consented to join this study. Living status was divided into 5 categories (1. same house as before the earthquake (reference group), 2. temporary small house, 3. apartment, 4. house of relatives or acquaintance, 5. new house) and economic hardship was divided into 4 categories (1. normal (reference group), 2. a little bit hard, 3. hard, 4. very hard). Gender, age, body mass index, living areas, smoking and drinking habits, complications of diabetes mellitus and cerebral stroke, working status, and walking time were considered as the confounding factors. Kessler Psychological Distress Scale of ≥10/24 and Athens Insomnia Scale of ≥6/24 points were defined as a presence of psychological distress and sleep disturbance, respectively. We used multiple logistic regression analysis to examine the association of shoulder pain with living environment, economic hardship, psychological distress, and sleep disturbance at 2 years after the earthquake. Results There were significant differences in the risk of having shoulder pain in those with “apartment” (OR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.03–2.96), “house of relatives or acquaintance” (OR = 2.98, 95% CI = 1.42–6.25), economic hardship of “hard” (OR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.08–2.7) and “very hard” (OR = 2.51, 95% CI = 1.47–4.29), and sleep disturbance (OR = 2.96, 95% CI = 2.05–4.27). Conclusions Living status of “apartment” and “house of relatives or acquaintance”, economic hardship of “hard” and “very hard”, and “sleep disturbance” were significantly associated with shoulder pain.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019155884&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019155884&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jos.2016.12.027
DO - 10.1016/j.jos.2016.12.027
M3 - Article
C2 - 28118947
AN - SCOPUS:85019155884
VL - 22
SP - 442
EP - 446
JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Science
JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Science
SN - 0949-2658
IS - 3
ER -
