TY - JOUR

T1 - Large-eddy simulation of airfoil flow near stall condition at Reynolds number 2.1 × 106

AU - Asada, Kengo

AU - Kawai, Soshi

N1 - Funding Information:
This research used computational resources of the K computer provided by the RIKEN Advanced Institute for Computational Science through the HPCI System Research project (Project ID: hp140028). This work was supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI (Grant No. 16K18309).
Funding Information:
7S. M. Hosseini, R. Vinuesa, P. Schlatter, A. Hanifi, and D. S. Henningson, “Direct numerical simulation of the flow around a wing section at moderate Reynolds number,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 61, 117–128 (2016). 8P. Sagaut and S. Deck, “Large eddy simulation for aerodynamics: Status and perspectives,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A 367, 2849–2860 (2009). 9J. H. Almutairi and I. M. AlQadi, “Large-eddy simulation of natural low-frequency oscillations of separating–reattaching flow near stall conditions,” AIAA J. 51, 981–991 (2013). 10J. H. M. Ribeiro and W. R. Wolf, “Identification of coherent structures in the flow past a NACA0012 airfoil via proper orthogonal decomposition,” Phys. Fluids 29, 085104 (2017). 11D. You and P. Moin, “Active control of flow separation over an airfoil using synthetic jets,” J. Fluids Struct. 24, 1349–1357 (2008). 12M. R. Visbal, “Strategies for control of transitional and turbulent flows using plasma-based actuators,” Int. J. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 24, 237–258 (2010). 13D. P. Rizzetta and M. R. Visbal, “Numerical investigation of plasma-based control for low-Reynolds-number airfoil flows,” AIAA J. 49, 411–425 (2011). 14M. Riherd and S. Roy, “Serpentine geometry plasma actuators for flow control,” J. Appl. Phys. 114, 083303 (2013). 15K. Asada, T. Nonomura, H. Aono, M. Sato, K. Okada, and K. Fujii, “LES of transient flows controlled by DBD plasma actuator over a stalled airfoil,” Int. J. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 29, 215–229 (2015). 16D. R. Chapman, “Computational aerodynamics development and outlook,” AIAA J. 17, 1293–1313 (1979). 17H. Choi and P. Moin, “Grid-point requirements for large eddy simulation: Chapman’s estimates revisited,” Phys. Fluids 24, 011702 (2012). 18P. R. Spalart, W. Jou, M. Strelets, and S. R. Allmaras, “Comments on the feasibility of LES for wings, and on a hybrid RANS/LES approach,” in First AFOSR International Conference on DNS/LES, edited by C. Liu and Z. Liu (Greyden Press, Columbus, OH, Ruston, LA, 1997). 19U. Piomelli and E. Balaras, “Wall-layer models for large-eddy simulations,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 34, 349–374 (2002). 20P. R. Spalart, “Detached-eddy simulation,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 41, 181–202 (2009). 21S. Kawai and J. Larsson, “Dynamic non-equilibrium wall-modeling for large eddy simulation at high Reynolds numbers,” Phys. Fluids 25, 015105 (2013). 22Y. Fukushima and S. Kawai, “Wall-modeled large-eddy simulation of tran-sonic airfoil buffet at high Reynolds number,” AIAA J. 56, 2372–2388 (2018). 23LESFOIL: Large Eddy Simulation of Flow Around a High Lift Airfoil: Results of the Project LESFOIL Supported by the European Union 1998-2001, edited by L. Davidson, D. Cokljat, J. Fröhlich, M. A. Leschziner, C. Mellen, and W. Rodi (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 2003). 24S. Kawai and K. Asada, “Wall-modeled large-eddy simulation of high Reynolds number flow around an airfoil near stall condition,” Comput. Fluids 85, 105–113 (2013). 25S. Kawai and J. Larsson, “Wall-modeling in large eddy simulation: Length scales, grid resolution, and accuracy,” Phys. Fluids 24, 015105 (2012). 26C. Gleyzes, “Opíon décrochage–résultats des essais á la souferie f2,” Technical Report RT-OA 19/5025, ONERA, 1978. 27I. Mary and P. Sagaut, “Large eddy simulation of flow around an airfoil near stall,” AIAA J. 40, 1139–1145 (2002). 28H. Aono, T. Nonomura, N. Iizuka, T. Ohsako, T. Inari, Y. Hashimoto, R. Takaki, and K. Fujii, “Scalar tuning of a fluid solver using compact scheme for a supercomputer with a distributed memory architecture,” CFD Lett. 5, 143–152 (2013). 29S. K. Lele, “Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolu-tion,” J. Comput. Phys. 103, 16–42 (1992). 30D. V. Gaitonde and M. R. Visbal, “Pade-type higher-order boundary filters for the Navier-Stokes equations,” AIAA J. 38, 2103–2112 (2000). 31S. Obayashi, K. Fujii, and S. Gavali, “Navier-Stokes simulation of wind-tunnel flow using LU-ADI factorization algorithm,” NASA-TM-100042, NASA, 1988. 32N. Iizuka, “Study of Mach number effect on the dynamic stability of a blunt re-entry capsule,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Tokyo, 2006. 33M. R. Visbal and D. V. Gaitonde, “High-order-accurate methods for complex unsteady subsonic flows,” AIAA J. 37, 1231–1239 (1999). 34M. R. Visbal and D. P. Rizzetta, “Large-eddy simulation on curvilinear grids using compact differencing and filtering schemes,” J. Fluids Eng. 124, 836–847 (2002).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Author(s).

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - This paper investigates an airfoil flow involving a turbulent transition and separations near the stall condition at a high Reynolds number Rec = 2.1 × 106 (based on the freestream velocity and the airfoil chord) and provides the wall-resolved large-eddy simulation (LES) database for near-wall models in LES. The present results are compared with the existing experimental and computational data. The wall-resolved LES with the finest mesh (Δξ+,Δη+,Δζ+: chordwise, wall normal, spanwise ≲25, 0.8, 13) and the widest spanwise extent (approximately 5% of the chord length) resolves the key phenomena of the flow (i.e., laminar separation, transition to turbulence, turbulent reattachment, turbulent boundary layer development, and turbulent separation) and well predicts turbulence statistics. The present LES also clarifies unsteady flow features associated with shear-layer instability: the high frequency unsteadiness of St ≃ 130 (based on the freestream velocity and the airfoil chord) at the laminar separation bubble near the leading edge and low frequency unsteadiness of St ≃ 2 at the turbulent separation near the trailing edge. The characteristic frequencies can be scaled to 0.035 and 0.033 by the local momentum thickness and the shear layer velocity which are similar to the natural frequency of the laminar and turbulent shear layer, respectively. With regard to the near-wall modeling in LES, the obtained database indicates that the pressure-gradient term in the mean streamwise-momentum equation is not negligible at the laminar and turbulent separated regions. This fact suggests that the widely used equilibrium wall model is not sufficient, and the inclusion of the pressure-gradient term is necessary for wall modeling in LES of such an airfoil flow. Additionally, influences of computational mesh resolution and spanwise extent on the computational results in wall-resolved LES are investigated.

AB - This paper investigates an airfoil flow involving a turbulent transition and separations near the stall condition at a high Reynolds number Rec = 2.1 × 106 (based on the freestream velocity and the airfoil chord) and provides the wall-resolved large-eddy simulation (LES) database for near-wall models in LES. The present results are compared with the existing experimental and computational data. The wall-resolved LES with the finest mesh (Δξ+,Δη+,Δζ+: chordwise, wall normal, spanwise ≲25, 0.8, 13) and the widest spanwise extent (approximately 5% of the chord length) resolves the key phenomena of the flow (i.e., laminar separation, transition to turbulence, turbulent reattachment, turbulent boundary layer development, and turbulent separation) and well predicts turbulence statistics. The present LES also clarifies unsteady flow features associated with shear-layer instability: the high frequency unsteadiness of St ≃ 130 (based on the freestream velocity and the airfoil chord) at the laminar separation bubble near the leading edge and low frequency unsteadiness of St ≃ 2 at the turbulent separation near the trailing edge. The characteristic frequencies can be scaled to 0.035 and 0.033 by the local momentum thickness and the shear layer velocity which are similar to the natural frequency of the laminar and turbulent shear layer, respectively. With regard to the near-wall modeling in LES, the obtained database indicates that the pressure-gradient term in the mean streamwise-momentum equation is not negligible at the laminar and turbulent separated regions. This fact suggests that the widely used equilibrium wall model is not sufficient, and the inclusion of the pressure-gradient term is necessary for wall modeling in LES of such an airfoil flow. Additionally, influences of computational mesh resolution and spanwise extent on the computational results in wall-resolved LES are investigated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051726270&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051726270&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1063/1.5037278

DO - 10.1063/1.5037278

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85051726270

VL - 30

JO - Physics of Fluids

JF - Physics of Fluids

SN - 1070-6631

IS - 8

M1 - 085103

ER -