Inter-annual variability of chlorophyll and sea-ice in the Antarctic Divergence region: An attempt to derive their quantitative relationship

T. Hirawake, S. Kudoh, S. Aoki, T. Odate, M. Fukuchi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Inter-annual variability in chlorophyll a (chl a) and sea-ice concentration in the Antarctic Divergence (AD) region near 140°E was examined using satellite sensor data in order to derive a quantitative relationship between the two. Seaviewing Wide Field-of-view Sensor (SeaWiFS) derived chl a and Special Sensor Microwave/Imager (SSM/I) derived sea-ice concentration data during 1997-2003 were analysed. Mean chl a concentration south of 64°S during the period between September and April (from austral spring to autumn) of each year was calculated. The mean chl a in 2001/2002 was extremely high (1.08 mg m-3) within the six periods between 1997/1998 and 2002/2003. Simply integrated indices on sea-ice amount, such as the maximum sea-ice extent in the winter season, annual integration of coverage area over ice edge to coast, were not able to explain interannual variation of chl a, especially the highest chl a value in 2001/2002. We found a high correlation between the chl a south of 64°S and the sea-ice index, which might be due to the surface meltwater of the sea-ice from the AD zone as a result of eddies. The quantitative relationship might have contributed to the prediction of phytoplankton blooms in this coastal region and demonstrated the impact of the sea-ice extent on the Antarctic marine ecosystem.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2035-2044
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Remote Sensing
Volume26
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005 May 20
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Inter-annual variability of chlorophyll and sea-ice in the Antarctic Divergence region: An attempt to derive their quantitative relationship'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this