TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of the surface morphologies and erosion/deposition profiles on the LHD first-wall by using toroidal array probes
AU - Tokitani, M.
AU - Masuzaki, S.
AU - Yoshida, N.
AU - Akiyama, T.
AU - Noda, N.
AU - Sagara, A.
AU - Yamada, H.
AU - Muroga, T.
AU - Nagata, S.
AU - Tsuchiya, B.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - Toroidal profiles of the microscopic damage and erosion/deposition on the Large Helical Device (LHD) first-wall (SUS316L) were simultaneously evaluated. 10 pairs of SUS316L and Si specimens were mounted on 10 sets of special holders, and were located on the outer side of the first-wall surface in each 36 toroidal angle section (Nos. 1-10). For separate determination of the effects of glow discharge cleanings (GDCs) and main plasma discharges, two types of holders - "floating-potential" and "ground-potential" - were used in each toroidal section. The former was electrically insulated from the first wall; therefore, energetic ions could not be injected into the specimens during GDC. Hence, we could analyze two cases: with and without GDCs exposure. Sputtering erosion of the first-wall surfaces was mainly caused by GDCs and not main plasma discharges, and the erosion depths of each toroidal section were varied from 50 nm to 1 μm. Characteristics of the deposition layers and microscopic damages on the SUS316L matrix were different in each toroidal section.
AB - Toroidal profiles of the microscopic damage and erosion/deposition on the Large Helical Device (LHD) first-wall (SUS316L) were simultaneously evaluated. 10 pairs of SUS316L and Si specimens were mounted on 10 sets of special holders, and were located on the outer side of the first-wall surface in each 36 toroidal angle section (Nos. 1-10). For separate determination of the effects of glow discharge cleanings (GDCs) and main plasma discharges, two types of holders - "floating-potential" and "ground-potential" - were used in each toroidal section. The former was electrically insulated from the first wall; therefore, energetic ions could not be injected into the specimens during GDC. Hence, we could analyze two cases: with and without GDCs exposure. Sputtering erosion of the first-wall surfaces was mainly caused by GDCs and not main plasma discharges, and the erosion depths of each toroidal section were varied from 50 nm to 1 μm. Characteristics of the deposition layers and microscopic damages on the SUS316L matrix were different in each toroidal section.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884905441&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884905441&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.03.019
DO - 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.03.019
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84884905441
SN - 0022-3115
VL - 442
SP - S873-S879
JO - Journal of Nuclear Materials
JF - Journal of Nuclear Materials
IS - 1-3 SUPPL.1
ER -