TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of the primary structure on the seismic response of the cable-net façade
AU - Xiang, Yang
AU - Zhang, Yu Jian
AU - Guo, Jia
AU - Chen, Jing
N1 - Funding Information:
The adopted earthquake records are downloaded from the Japanese NIED strong-motion seismograph networks. The authors acknowledge Dr. Isabella Vassilopoulou for sharing knowledge on the nonlinear resonance of cable-nets. In particular, Yang Xiang gratefully acknowledges Yi-Liang Zhou for the steady supports all along.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/10/1
Y1 - 2020/10/1
N2 - The cable-net supported façade is increasingly used in the modern buildings. In a cable-net façade, the ends of the cables are anchored to the primary structure along its elevation, and the façade's seismic response is triggered by the earthquake-induced vibration of the primary structure. In this regard, the effect of the primary structure should be considered in the seismic response analysis of the cable-net façades. However, such an effect is ignored in most of the preceding research. In this paper, the effect of the primary structure on the seismic response of the cable-net façade is quantitatively studied. A group of cable-net models is subjected to two types of earthquake excitations. First, the ground accelerations are uniformly applied to the cable-net models. In this case, the effect of the primary structure is neglected. Second, the ground accelerations are applied to a series of primary structural models, generating the height-wise non-uniform dynamic excitations for the cable-nets, and the cable-nets are subjected to the non-uniform excitations. In this case, the effect of the primary structure is fully accounted for. A detailed comparison between the two groups of results is conducted. It is shown that the primary structure significantly influences the peak response of the cable-net façade, and such influences are strongly affected by the fundamental period ratio (RT) between the cable-net and the primary structure. For RT ≤ 0.6, it would be overly conservative to neglect the effect of the primary structure, while for RT ≥ 0.8 (especially at RT ≥ 1.0), it is unsafe to neglect such effects. If RT is around 1.0, the mid-span displacement of the cable-net façade under the non-uniform excitation (considering the effect of the primary structure) could be twice as large as that under the uniform excitation. Meanwhile, the tension of cables could exhibit a 20% increase due to the effect of the primary structure. The results obtained from different types of primary structures (varied lateral force resisting mechanism) are similar. From this study, it is inappropriate to ignore the effect of the primary structure in analyzing the seismic responses of the cable-net façades. This indicates the drawback of many preceding studies wherein the effect of the primary structure is neglected, and shows the necessity of developing a proper approach to account for this effect in the design of the cable-net façades.
AB - The cable-net supported façade is increasingly used in the modern buildings. In a cable-net façade, the ends of the cables are anchored to the primary structure along its elevation, and the façade's seismic response is triggered by the earthquake-induced vibration of the primary structure. In this regard, the effect of the primary structure should be considered in the seismic response analysis of the cable-net façades. However, such an effect is ignored in most of the preceding research. In this paper, the effect of the primary structure on the seismic response of the cable-net façade is quantitatively studied. A group of cable-net models is subjected to two types of earthquake excitations. First, the ground accelerations are uniformly applied to the cable-net models. In this case, the effect of the primary structure is neglected. Second, the ground accelerations are applied to a series of primary structural models, generating the height-wise non-uniform dynamic excitations for the cable-nets, and the cable-nets are subjected to the non-uniform excitations. In this case, the effect of the primary structure is fully accounted for. A detailed comparison between the two groups of results is conducted. It is shown that the primary structure significantly influences the peak response of the cable-net façade, and such influences are strongly affected by the fundamental period ratio (RT) between the cable-net and the primary structure. For RT ≤ 0.6, it would be overly conservative to neglect the effect of the primary structure, while for RT ≥ 0.8 (especially at RT ≥ 1.0), it is unsafe to neglect such effects. If RT is around 1.0, the mid-span displacement of the cable-net façade under the non-uniform excitation (considering the effect of the primary structure) could be twice as large as that under the uniform excitation. Meanwhile, the tension of cables could exhibit a 20% increase due to the effect of the primary structure. The results obtained from different types of primary structures (varied lateral force resisting mechanism) are similar. From this study, it is inappropriate to ignore the effect of the primary structure in analyzing the seismic responses of the cable-net façades. This indicates the drawback of many preceding studies wherein the effect of the primary structure is neglected, and shows the necessity of developing a proper approach to account for this effect in the design of the cable-net façades.
KW - Cable-net, flexible façade
KW - Continuous structural model
KW - Curtain wall
KW - Non-structural component
KW - Non-uniform excitation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086994800&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85086994800&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110989
DO - 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110989
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85086994800
VL - 220
JO - Structural Engineering Review
JF - Structural Engineering Review
SN - 0141-0296
M1 - 110989
ER -