TY - JOUR
T1 - Dyslexia and dysgraphia of primary progressive aphasia in Chinese
T2 - A systematic review
AU - Liu, Junyan
AU - Ota, Shoko
AU - Kawakami, Nobuko
AU - Kanno, Shigenori
AU - Suzuki, Kyoko
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by JST, the Establishment of University Fellowships toward the Creation of Science Technology Innovation, Grant Number JPMJFS2102. This work was also supported by Health Labour Sciences Research [Grant Nos. 20GB1002 and 20GC1008], Grant-in-Aid for Transformative Research Areas [Grant No. 20H05956], and Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) [Grant No. 21H03779] to KS.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 Liu, Ota, Kawakami, Kanno and Suzuki.
PY - 2022/12/6
Y1 - 2022/12/6
N2 - Introduction: Currently, little is known about Chinese-speaking primary progressive aphasia (PPA) patients compared to patients who speak Indo-European languages. We examined the demographics and clinical manifestations, particularly reading and writing characteristics, of Chinese patients with PPA over the last two decades to establish a comprehensive profile and improve diagnosis and care. Methods: We reviewed the demographic features, clinical manifestations, and radiological features of Chinese-speaking PPA patients from 56 articles published since 1994. We then summarized the specific reading and writing errors of Chinese-speaking patients. Results: The average age of onset for Chinese-speaking patients was in their early 60's, and there were slightly more male patients than female patients. The core symptoms and images of Chinese-speaking patients were similar to those of patients who speak Indo-European languages. Reading and writing error patterns differed due to Chinese's distinct tone and orthography. The types of reading errors reported in Chinese-speaking patients with PPA included tonal errors, regularization errors, visually related errors, semantic errors, phonological errors, unrelated errors, and non-response. Among these errors, regularization errors were the most common in semantic variant PPA, and tonal errors were specific to Chinese. Writing errors mainly consisted of non-character errors (stroke, radical/component, visual, pictograph, dyskinetic errors, and spatial errors), phonologically plausible errors, orthographically similar errors, semantic errors, compound word errors, sequence errors, unrelated errors, and non-response. Conclusion: This paper provides the latest comprehensive demographic information and unique presentations on the reading and writing of Chinese-speaking patients with PPA. More detailed studies are needed to address the frequency of errors in reading and writing and their anatomical substrates.
AB - Introduction: Currently, little is known about Chinese-speaking primary progressive aphasia (PPA) patients compared to patients who speak Indo-European languages. We examined the demographics and clinical manifestations, particularly reading and writing characteristics, of Chinese patients with PPA over the last two decades to establish a comprehensive profile and improve diagnosis and care. Methods: We reviewed the demographic features, clinical manifestations, and radiological features of Chinese-speaking PPA patients from 56 articles published since 1994. We then summarized the specific reading and writing errors of Chinese-speaking patients. Results: The average age of onset for Chinese-speaking patients was in their early 60's, and there were slightly more male patients than female patients. The core symptoms and images of Chinese-speaking patients were similar to those of patients who speak Indo-European languages. Reading and writing error patterns differed due to Chinese's distinct tone and orthography. The types of reading errors reported in Chinese-speaking patients with PPA included tonal errors, regularization errors, visually related errors, semantic errors, phonological errors, unrelated errors, and non-response. Among these errors, regularization errors were the most common in semantic variant PPA, and tonal errors were specific to Chinese. Writing errors mainly consisted of non-character errors (stroke, radical/component, visual, pictograph, dyskinetic errors, and spatial errors), phonologically plausible errors, orthographically similar errors, semantic errors, compound word errors, sequence errors, unrelated errors, and non-response. Conclusion: This paper provides the latest comprehensive demographic information and unique presentations on the reading and writing of Chinese-speaking patients with PPA. More detailed studies are needed to address the frequency of errors in reading and writing and their anatomical substrates.
KW - Chinese-speaking patients
KW - primary progressive aphasia
KW - reading errors
KW - tonal errors
KW - writing errors
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85144338952&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85144338952&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fneur.2022.1025660
DO - 10.3389/fneur.2022.1025660
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85144338952
SN - 1664-2295
VL - 13
JO - Frontiers in Neurology
JF - Frontiers in Neurology
M1 - 1025660
ER -