Differential cognitive effects of ebastine and (+)-chlorpheniramine in healthy subjects: Correlation between cognitive impairment and plasma drug concentration

Masaaki Tagawa, Michiko Kano, Nobuyuki Okamura, Makoto Higuchi, Michiaki Matsuda, Yasuyuki Mizuki, Hiroyuki Arai, Toshihiko Fujii, Sadao Komemushi, Masatoshi Itoh, Hidetada Sasaki, Takehiko Watanabe, Kazuhiko Yanai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims: It has been widely recognized that classical antihistamines induce sedation as an adverse effect, while second-generation antihistamines have few if any sedative effects. In order to evaluate the sedative properties of ebastine, a second-generation antihistamine, its effect on cognitive performance in healthy subjects was compared with placebo and (+)-chlorpheniramine. Methods: Twelve healthy male subjects were instructed to perform six types of attention demanding cognitive tasks, and objective measurements of reaction times and accuracy was made before and after drug administration. Their sleepiness levels were also monitored. Test drugs were ebastine 10 mg, placebo and two doses of (+)-chlorpheniramine 2 mg and 6 mg, as positive controls. Plasma drug concentrations at the end of the study were analysed. Results: After treatments with (+)-chlorpheniramine, the reaction times of the tasks were significantly prolonged (e.g. ratios of after/before dosing: placebo (0.998 ± 0.113) vs (+)-chlorpheniramine 2 mg (1.103 ± 0.083; P < 0.05) or (+)-chlorpheniramine 6 mg (1.170 ± 0.139; P < 0.001) in a 7 ms visual discrimination time task) and the accuracy was significantly decreased (e.g. ratios: placebo (1.038 ± 0.158) vs (+)-chlorpheniramine 2 mg (0.792 ± 0.202; P < 0.01) or (+)-chlorpheniramine 6 mg (0.837 ± 0.222; P < 0.05) in a 7 ms task). On the other hand, performance was not affected by ebastine or placebo treatment (e.g. ebastine 10 mg (reaction time ratio; 1.014 ± 0.067 and accuracy ratio; 0.990 ± 0.146) in a 7 ms task). Subjective sleepiness was also not affected by ebastine but (+)-chlorpheniramine significantly increased sedation. With respect to the relationship between plasma drug concentrations and task performance, the latter deteriorated with an increase in plasma (+)-chlorpheniramine concentration (e.g. r = 0.439 (P = 0.007) in a 5 ms and r = 0.352 (P = 0.039) in a 7 ms task), but it did not correlate with the plasma concentration of carebastine, an active metabolite of ebastine. Conclusions: Ebastine 10 mg did not cause any cognitive impairment or subjective sleepiness. On the other hand, (+)-chlorpheniramine impaired cognitive function and induced sleepiness even at 2 mg, the recommended dose in over-the-counter medication. In addition, impaired CNS performance was significantly correlated with plasma (+)-chlorpheniramine concentration.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)296-304
Number of pages9
JournalBritish journal of clinical pharmacology
Volume53
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Keywords

  • (+)-Chlorpheniramine
  • Cognition
  • Ebastine
  • Plasma concentration
  • Tachistoscope

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Differential cognitive effects of ebastine and (+)-chlorpheniramine in healthy subjects: Correlation between cognitive impairment and plasma drug concentration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this