Dexmedetomidine improved renal function in patients with severe sepsis: An exploratory analysis of a randomized controlled trial

Tsuyoshi Nakashima, Kyohei Miyamoto, Nozomu Shima, Seiya Kato, Yu Kawazoe, Yoshinori Ohta, Takeshi Morimoto, Hitoshi Yamamura, Masaou Tanaka, Tomonori Yamamoto, Akihiro Fuke, Atsunori Hashimoto, Hiroyuki Koami, Satoru Beppu, Yoichi Katayama, Makoto Itoh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Dexmedetomidine has been reported to improve organ dysfunction in critically ill patients. In a recent randomized controlled trial (Dexmedetomidine for Sepsis in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Randomized Evolution [DESIRE]), we demonstrated that dexmedetomidine was associated with reduced mortality risk among patients with severe sepsis. We performed this exploratory sub-analysis to examine the mechanism underlying improved survival in patients sedated with dexmedetomidine. Methods: The DESIRE trial compared a sedation strategy with and without dexmedetomidine among 201 mechanically ventilated adult patients with sepsis across eight ICUs in Japan. In the present study, we included 104 patients with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores of ≥ 23 (54 in the dexmedetomidine [DEX] group and 50 in the non-dexmedetomidine [non-DEX] group). Initially, we compared the changes in the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores from the baseline within 6 days after randomization between groups. Subsequently, we evaluated the variables comprising the organ component of the SOFA score that showed relevant improvement in the initial comparison. Results: The mean patient age was 71.0 ± 14.1 years. There was no difference in the median APACHE II score between the two groups (29 [interquartile range (IQR), 25-31] vs. 30 [IQR, 25-33]; p = 0.35). The median SOFA score at the baseline was lower in the DEX group (9 [IQR, 7-11] vs. 11 [IQR, 9-13]; p = 0.01). While the renal SOFA subscore at the baseline was similar for both groups, it significantly decreased in the DEX group on day 4 (p = 0.02). During the first 6 days, the urinary output was not significantly different (p = 0.09), but serum creatinine levels were significantly lower (p = 0.04) in the DEX group. The 28-day and in-hospital mortality rates were significantly lower in the DEX group (22% vs. 42%; p = 0.03, 28% vs. 52%; p = 0.01, respectively). Conclusion: A sedation strategy with dexmedetomidine is associated with improved renal function and decrease mortality rates among patients with severe sepsis. Trial registration: This trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01760967) on January 1, 2013.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1
JournalJournal of Intensive Care
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020 Jan 2

Keywords

  • Acute kidney injury
  • Dexmedetomidine
  • Sedation
  • Septic shock
  • Sequential organ failure assessment score

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Dexmedetomidine improved renal function in patients with severe sepsis: An exploratory analysis of a randomized controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this