Our paper  reported that the estimated temperature modulation for the perpendicularly magnetized (PM) configuration (ΔTPM) in the absence of the heat loss to the substrate was 81 K with taking into account the sample dimensions, and the resultant anomalous Ettingshausen coefficient (?AEE) was 1.1 × 10-3 V. However, we were aware that ΔTPM = 81 K was wrong. The correct value is ΔTPM = 17.5 K, and ?AEE is calculated to be 2.4 × 10-4 V. These changes do not affect the conclusion of the paper.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
- Condensed Matter Physics
- Acoustics and Ultrasonics
- Surfaces, Coatings and Films