Correction to: Anisotropic magnetoresistance effect of a strong ferromagnet: magnetization direction dependence in a model with crystal field: Anisotropic magnetoresistance effect of a strong ferromagnet: magnetization direction dependence in a model with crystal field (physica status solidi (c), (2014), 11, 5-6, (1026-1032), 10.1002/pssc.201300736)

Satoshi Kokado, Masakiyo Tsunoda

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

We give a correct expression for C4 in the above paper. To be more precise, we should delete the higher-order (HO) term with (λ/δg)2 in C4. This HO term was finally ignored because of its small value in the paper. The correction therefore does not change the main results of the paper. For C4 of Eq. (29), we should delete the (λ/δg)2 term. Namely, the correct expression of C4 of Eq. (29) is given as (Formula presented.) In accordance with the revision of C4, we should delete a sentence which starts from 5th line from top in the right side of p. 1029, i.e., “Note that, from now on, we ignore the second term of the right-hand side of C4, i.e., (3/32) (λ/δg)2[(λ/∆) - λ/(|Hex| + ∆)]2, because this term is considered to be sufficiently smaller than the first term with only (λ/∆)2 and [λ/(|Hex| - ∆)]2 due to δg > |λ|.”.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1700218
JournalPhysica Status Solidi (C) Current Topics in Solid State Physics
Volume14
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Sep

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Condensed Matter Physics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Correction to: Anisotropic magnetoresistance effect of a strong ferromagnet: magnetization direction dependence in a model with crystal field: Anisotropic magnetoresistance effect of a strong ferromagnet: magnetization direction dependence in a model with crystal field (physica status solidi (c), (2014), 11, 5-6, (1026-1032), 10.1002/pssc.201300736)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this