TY - GEN
T1 - Comparison of stress field change around a fault by dynamic fault ruptusimulation using 3d-fem
AU - Iwata, N.
AU - Kiyota, R.
AU - Aydan,
AU - Ito, T.
AU - Miura, F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Taylor & Francis Group, London.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - When we are able to evaluate earthquake-induced stress changes of the ground around ruptured faults and adjacent faults, it will be possible to improve the prediction accuracy of the magnitude and probability of future earthquakes. Generally, the interaction between active faults is represented by static Coulomb stress changes (ΔCFF) induced by fault rupturing. In most cases, ΔCFF is calculated based on the elasticity theory of dislocation; there are few studies where it is calculated by 3D-FEM. In this study, we conducted fault rupture simulations using 3D-FEM for simple models with a planar fault plane and homogeneous bedrock and examined the influence of fault type and initial stress distribution. As a result, ΔCFF calculated by 3D-FEM became considerably larger than that calculated by the elasticity theory of dislocation. Moreover, even when a fault type and seismic magnitude were the same, the distribution domain and quantity of ΔCFF differed greatly owing to the combination of analytical parameters.
AB - When we are able to evaluate earthquake-induced stress changes of the ground around ruptured faults and adjacent faults, it will be possible to improve the prediction accuracy of the magnitude and probability of future earthquakes. Generally, the interaction between active faults is represented by static Coulomb stress changes (ΔCFF) induced by fault rupturing. In most cases, ΔCFF is calculated based on the elasticity theory of dislocation; there are few studies where it is calculated by 3D-FEM. In this study, we conducted fault rupture simulations using 3D-FEM for simple models with a planar fault plane and homogeneous bedrock and examined the influence of fault type and initial stress distribution. As a result, ΔCFF calculated by 3D-FEM became considerably larger than that calculated by the elasticity theory of dislocation. Moreover, even when a fault type and seismic magnitude were the same, the distribution domain and quantity of ΔCFF differed greatly owing to the combination of analytical parameters.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091646790&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85091646790&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1201/9780429327933-36
DO - 10.1201/9780429327933-36
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85091646790
SN - 9780367347833
T3 - Rock Dynamics Summit - Proceedings of the 2019 Rock Dynamics Summit, RDS 2019
SP - 232
EP - 237
BT - Rock Dynamics Summit - Proceedings of the 2019 Rock Dynamics Summit, RDS 2019
A2 - Aydan, Omer
A2 - Ito, Takashi
A2 - Seiki, Takafumi
A2 - Kamemura, Katsumi
A2 - Iwata, Naoki
PB - CRC Press/Balkema
T2 - Rock Dynamics Summit, RDS 2019
Y2 - 7 May 2019 through 11 May 2019
ER -