Comparison of magnetic field analysis methods considering magnetic anisotropy

Teruyuki Tamaki, Keisuke Fujisaki, Kiyoshi Wajima, Koji Fujiwara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The magnetic field analysis results on grain-oriented silicon steel sheet and nongrain-oriented silicon steel sheet by the isotropic method, the two-axis isotropic method, the two-axis anisotropic method, the ψ anisotropic method, and the θHB anisotropic method, which are 2-D magnetic analysis methods, are compared. In analyzing the magnetic field in the isotropic material, the isotropic method is more appropriate than the two-axis isotropic method. For the anisotropic material in which the magnetic flux density is much less than saturation magnetic flux density, the two-axis anisotropic method is more preferable than the ψ anisotropic method, because the result of the two-axis anisotropic method is similar to that of the θHB anisotropic method. However, for the analysis in high magnetic flux density near the saturation magnetic flux density, the ψ anisotropic method is more suitable than the two-axis anisotropic method.

Original languageEnglish
Article number5393227
Pages (from-to)187-190
Number of pages4
JournalIEEE Transactions on Magnetics
Volume46
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Feb 1

Keywords

  • 2-D magnetic property
  • Anisotropy
  • Magnetic field analysis
  • Silicon steel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of magnetic field analysis methods considering magnetic anisotropy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this