TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical results of rehabilitation for accessory nerve palsy after radical neck dissection
AU - Shimada, Yoichi
AU - Chida, Satoaki
AU - Matsunaga, Toshiki
AU - Sato, Mineyoshi
AU - Hatakeyama, Kazutoshi
AU - Itoi, Eiji
PY - 2007/4/27
Y1 - 2007/4/27
N2 - Conclusions. Occupational therapy significantly improves shoulder range of motion in patients with accessory nerve palsy after radical neck dissection, but it has limited effects on the associated pain. Objective. To evaluate the outcome of occupational therapy rehabilitation for patients with accessory nerve palsy. Patients and methods. The occupational therapy group involved 35 shoulders of 29 patients with accessory nerve palsy after radical neck dissection; the control group included 10 shoulders of 9 patients who did not receive occupational therapy. All patients had a malignant tumor in the head or neck that necessitated radical neck dissection. We collected data pertaining to resting pain, motion pain, and the active and passive range of motion during shoulder flexion and abduction. Results. Occupational therapy did not adequately relieve resting or motion pain, but all patients achieved independence in activities of daily living and housekeeping activities. Although occupational therapy significantly improved shoulder elevation for all movements, shoulder elevation was significantly better for flexion than for active and passive abduction.
AB - Conclusions. Occupational therapy significantly improves shoulder range of motion in patients with accessory nerve palsy after radical neck dissection, but it has limited effects on the associated pain. Objective. To evaluate the outcome of occupational therapy rehabilitation for patients with accessory nerve palsy. Patients and methods. The occupational therapy group involved 35 shoulders of 29 patients with accessory nerve palsy after radical neck dissection; the control group included 10 shoulders of 9 patients who did not receive occupational therapy. All patients had a malignant tumor in the head or neck that necessitated radical neck dissection. We collected data pertaining to resting pain, motion pain, and the active and passive range of motion during shoulder flexion and abduction. Results. Occupational therapy did not adequately relieve resting or motion pain, but all patients achieved independence in activities of daily living and housekeeping activities. Although occupational therapy significantly improved shoulder elevation for all movements, shoulder elevation was significantly better for flexion than for active and passive abduction.
KW - Occupational therapy
KW - Pain
KW - Shoulder range of motion
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247323491&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34247323491&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00016480600895151
DO - 10.1080/00016480600895151
M3 - Article
C2 - 17453475
AN - SCOPUS:34247323491
VL - 127
SP - 491
EP - 497
JO - Acta Oto-Laryngologica
JF - Acta Oto-Laryngologica
SN - 0001-6489
IS - 5
ER -